THE ORIGINAL & LARGEST MILLIONAIRE DATING SINCE 2001
Member's Blog > Goodlucktome1969's blogs > The government's OVER REACTION is....

The government's OVER REACTION is....

Members Only
Our government's over reaction is going to literally destroy and kill far more lives than this normal virus will ever. People will suffer from depression, domestic violence, child abuse, drug addiction, alcoholism, crimes of theft, suicides, bankruptcy, starvation, etc...

Why? Because a very small percentage of people who were old and weak to begin with are dying. They would have died with likely any type of illness that came their way.

Our government is currently acting like a puppet and the people are pulling the strings caused by irrational fear driven by the media.

This should be classified as CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT. Our civil liberties and freedoms are being stripped and not many are questioning out of irrational fear.

Why is everyone being told to stay home? if you are sick, stay home, if you are afraid of being sick or one of the weak, stay home. Dont make everyone else do it.

it is time to flip this coin over and turn the corner. Shut the media off and this will go away. it will if you do that. That is how it got here
Sort by:
newest post
  • oldest post
  • newest post
Members Only
replying to Author
April 20 Total posts: 16
👍
Members Only
people were so concerned about losing their freedoms before all of this happened and they forgot about freedom of speech and freedom to ask questions. What people should be concerned with is the fact that asking questions has become something which is viewed with fear . Critical thinking has been demonized. This in itself is far more scary than the virus itself. What's wrong with asking questions? Why should we not investigate? Are we to blindly follow without knowing exactly what's going on?
Members Only
@goodlucktome1969 Do you ever visit NYC? Come see me this summer 😉
Members Only
replying to Author
April 16 Total posts: 16
Wow! I am. I am thinking about the 99.5% of the population ,.
Members Only

Wow, think about someone other than yourself.

Members Only
replying to Author
April 12 Total posts: 16
. 👍👍👍👍
Members Only
replying to Author
April 4 Total posts: 211

Still no lockdown in Sweden

"Radio stations broadcast prevention messages to wash hands frequently and to avoid touching one's face. The watchword: be careful. And also, "behave like adults" but above all else "don’t panic", in the words of the Prime Minister himself, Mr. Löfven, member of the Social Democratic Workers Party. It seems to be all a matter of "trust", of which Swedes are very capable, as is put into focus in an analysis by Foreign Policy

Members Only
replying to Author
April 4 Total posts: 211

….and lest we forget the wisely words of Benjamin Franklin who said:


"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."


You can always recognize a socialist, he's the guy who turns up at your door to help you ….along with his squad of gunmen.

Members Only
replying to Author
April 4 Total posts: 211

Again, your gyno-centric view point will lead us to ruin, its NOT a balanced perspective.


Do you recognize that we are being marched towards a new form of Stalinism?


Do you actually think or do you just rabbit college indoctrination camp rhetoric?


Wake up!



Our liberty and prosperity are in peril if COVID-19 triggers an arms race of compassion



Since the first responsibility of the state is to protect its citizens, it is understandable why, faced with a pandemic on a scale not seen since 1918, drastic measures have been taken to try to keep loss of life to a minimum. However, some of the emergency policies launched to respond to the coronavirus pandemic could remain in place and that will more deeply entrench government across the economy and civil society.



Political leaders face two challenges: first, to judge carefully when restrictions can be lifted and to strike a balance between the damage caused by the virus and that caused by economic ruin; second, to ensure those restrictions do not leave a legacy in liberal societies, but are removed so society can proceed as before. This won’t be popular to read in certain circles, but the enthusiasm with which some governments – at home and abroad – have decided to print money and increase police powers has been disturbing.



When police accost people sunbathing alone – or use drones to monitor people walking on hillsides (as they have done in England) – people are entitled to be outraged. The delight some police take in asserting the powers the state gives them is uncomfortably clear.



The coronavirus pandemic is a grave moment in human history. But it should not be prove to be a pivotal one, becoming a moment where society changes profoundly and permanently. Once the main threat has passed, restoring the liberty of citizens to go where they wish on public property, when they wish, and with whom they wish may prove the least of the problems for society. It will be far more difficult for governments to remove wage subsidies, reduce debt and restabilise economies. For one thing, some workers will be seduced by the new dispensation, unaware that the cost to supposedly richer taxpayers is nothing compared with the cost to the future of the economy. For another thing, the socialist that seems to exist within even supposedly liberal, free-market politicians finds it so easy to prevail, because those politicians feel it gives them an acceptable degree of serious power.



This sits at odds with true liberals – that is, those who believe that the function of governments is to find ways of distributing power from the state to the people. The pandemic has forced the closure of many businesses in every economy. Some of the smaller and more vulnerable ones will never reopen. Once the grave threat from the pandemic has passed, governments should do everything possible to ensure a minimum level of regulation so the next wave of entrepreneurs can enter the marketplace as easily as possible. This means resisting the temptation to increase taxes, which would stifle innovation, retard the recovery and risk drawing the world into a 1930s-style depression. Of course, businesses have generally supported the widespread subsidy of wages around the world while they are closed. It means they can afford to retain staff and not have their employees’ hardship on their conscience. However, these can only ever be emergency measures. The destruction of prosperity and personal liberty that would come from their retention should be easy for any businessman or woman to understand.

Members Only
replying to Author
April 3 Total posts: 211

The death rate in Covid-19 patients ages 80 and over was 10.4%, compared to


5.35% in 70-somethings,

1.51% in patients 60 to 69,

0.37% in 50-somethings.


Even lower rates were seen in younger people, dropping to zero in those 29 and younger.


Note - nearly all the older people had pre-existing illnesses while a significant percentage of the under 70's did also.

Members Only
replying to Author
April 3 Total posts: 211

You do realize that a sample size of 6000 deaths is still too small to produce a statistically significant result in terms of age right?

Some stats....

COVID-19:

Approximately 48,320 deaths reported worldwide; 5,137 deaths in the U.S., as of Apr. 2, 2020.

* Flu:

291,000 to 646,000 deaths worldwide; 12,000 to 61,000 deaths in the U.S. per year.

So typically as many as 61,000 people die from flu in the US each year.



The test question ….


Should the global economy shut down if it would mean saving ONE human life?


shines a light on the level of your rational thinking and dare I say, theres good reason why you refuse to answer it. .

Members Only
replying to Author
April 2 Total posts: 211

Heres a test for you.


Should the global economy shut down if it would mean saving ONE human life?

Members Only
replying to Author
April 2 Total posts: 211

99% of all deaths were people who had other existing illnesses regardless of age ...of course..

Members Only
what is your point Malinka5? Young people die of the flu every year also. Thousands!
Members Only
The us-against-them mentality is rather intellectually underdeveloped type thinking. We will all one day if we are lucky become part of the elderly population. Understand that all of us in some way and on some level are connected whether you like it or not there for your attempt and separating yourself as a superior being from others is somewhat prehistoric and simplistic
Members Only
replying to Author
March 31 Total posts: 211

You realize Sweden has decided to take no action regarding the corona virus, right? Currently their corona virus statistics are no worse than neighboring Denmark who is taking the draconian lockdown approach.

Members Only

Here is a summary of what the 10 recent experts say:


Dr Karin Mölling is a German virologist whose research focused on retroviruses, particularly human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)“That is the main fear: the disease is presented as a terrible disease. The disease per se is like the flu in a normal winter. It is even weaker in the first week…“There is no evidence to show that the 2019 coronavirus is more lethal than respiratory adenoviruses, influenza viruses, coronaviruses from previous years, or rhinoviruses responsible for the common cold.”


Dr Pablo Goldschmidt is an Argentine-French virologist specializing in tropical diseases, and Professor of Molecular Pharmacology at the Université Pierre et Marie Curie in Paris.“The coronavirus identified in China in 2019 caused nothing less than a strong cold or flu, with no difference so far with cold or flu as we know.


”Dr Eran Bendavid and Dr Jay Bhattacharya are professors of medicine and public health at Stanford University.“We should undertake immediate steps to evaluate the empirical basis of the current lockdowns.


”Dr Michael Levitt is Professor of biochemistry at Stanford University. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society (FRS), a member of the National Academy of Sciences and received the 2013 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the development of multiscale models for complex chemical systems.“To put things in proportion, the number of deaths of coronavirus in Italy is 10% of the number of deaths of influenza in the country between 2016-2017.


”Dr Richard Schabas is the former Chief Medical Officer of Ontario, Medical Officer of Hastings and Prince Edward Public Health and Chief of Staff at York Central Hospital.“…the Hubei outbreak – by far the largest, and a kind of worst-case scenario – appears to be winding down. How bad was it? Well, the number of deaths was comparable to an average influenza season. “That’s not nothing, but it’s not catastrophic, either, and it isn’t likely to overwhelm a competent health-care system. Not even close.

Members Only
the term that you used to describe our elderly population seems to be severely lacking in basic human compassion and decency.
Members Only

https://youtu.be/iMl0ty6evhU this is Bill Gates talking on TedTalks on YouTube. It’s exactly what’s happening now. In Australia they are mandatory vaccination to visit parents in nursing home and for children to go to school. I don’t agree with mandatory anything. Another video to share that I am sure you are aware of is EU 5G Appeal – Scientists warn of potential serious health effects of 5G the virus isn’t going to kill us it’s the 5G wireless https://www.jrseco.com/european-union-5g-appeal-scientists-warn-of-potential-serious-health-effects-of-5g/


Ionizing radiation is the reason we wear sunscreen outside because short-wavelength ultraviolet light from the sky has enough energy to knock electrons from their atoms, damaging skin cells and DNA. Millimeter waves, on the other hand, are non-ionizing because they have longer wavelengths and not enough energy to damage cells directly.


"The only established hazard of non-ionizing radiation is too much heating," Foster said, who has studied the health effects of radio waves for nearly 50 years. "At high exposure levels, radio frequency (RF) energy can indeed be hazardous, producing burns or other thermal damage, but these exposures are typically incurred only in occupational settings near high-powered radio frequency transmitters, or sometimes in medical procedures gone awry." Many of the public's outcries over the adoption of 5G echo concerns over previous generations of cellular technology.


Skeptics believe exposure to non-ionizing radiation may still be responsible for a range of illnesses, from brain tumors to chronic headaches. Over the years, there have been thousands of studies investigating these concerns. In 2018, the National Toxicology Program released a decade-long study that found some evidence of an increase in brain and adrenal gland tumors in male rats exposed to the RF radiation emitted by 2G and 3G cellphones, but not in mice or female rats. The animals were exposed to levels of radiation four times higher than the maximum level permitted for human exposure.


Many opponents to the use of RF waves cherry-pick studies that support their argument, and often ignore the quality of the experimental methods or inconsistency of the results, Foster said. Although he disagrees with many of the conclusions skeptics have about previous generations of cellular networks, Foster agrees that we need more studies on the potential health effects of 5G networks. "Everyone I know, including me, is recommending more research on 5G because there's not a lot of toxicology studies with this technology," Foster said. For the proponents of 5G, many believe the benefits 5G can provide to society far outweigh the unknowns. "I think 5G will have a transformational impact on our lives and enable fundamentally new things," Krishnaswamy said. "What those types of applications will be and what that impact is, we can't say for sure right now.


It could be something that takes us by surprise and really changes something for society. If history has taught us anything, then 5G will be another example of what wireless can do for us."

This a start of a bigger depopulation by 95% of the world population will be deleted. Check this out it seems to have gotten good information took some time to research. https://m.facebook.com/angstuffkow/videos/575376913190116/?refsrc=https%3A%2F%2Fm.facebook.com%2Fangstuffkow%2Fposts%2F625495884693788&_rdr