#1 Dating Site for Successful Singles and Admirers

Home > Millionaire Forums > Women > rich women Previous topic Next topic
Jump to:
rich women
Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 19:18


Krystalblue40 write:
I would beg to differ. If you were confident you wouldn't constantly bring up how many men on here love you. We are all getting emails from men. If that were the case you wouldn't be on here strutting your stuff. You are very insulting because of your own insecurities.



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAA You are funny!! You should be a comedian. :-)



Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 15:54


Mandalay207 write:
Andy,

Please don't be to hard on Butter, she actually gave me an idea earlier in one of her posts in which I can make a ton of money from this site! And Andy, you know me with my Entrepreneurial Spirit, if I see a door open, I'm going right through it! Butter, I will get with you at a later date, since you did give me the idea, we'll call it a "finders fee" which you will be entitled to a certain lump sum...I'll keep you posted.

And now back to our regularly scheduled broadcast: Rich Women v. Rich Women.




Mandalay,

Well, unless I get a cut too I feel no such obligation. LOL.

Andy

P.S. Mandalay made me edit this just so it would appear after his - - after he felt compelled to fix a spelling mistake! Has anyone ever met someone so ana*l? LOL



Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 15:50


NYCHICK write:
i am not the voice of God- i state my opinion-- if u need to go to therapy afterward well then take a cab and go..

i think the worst thing i said was the chick sittin on furniture and that perhaps another woman should lose her sweater.. now if they are in a tizzy over that...well perhaps less time on millionaire match and more time on therapist chair.. makes sense to me




Ah NYCHICK,

People who misquote themselves or quote themselves out of context make me a bit suspicious. Here's a bit of the context you "forgot".

to Sharp1: ...now my advice for u- since i am rich and pretty and u arent.. is lose the background, change the sweater ....

Oh NY, but there's more!

To 1HM: as for the chick who fell off the chair.and is writing from the floor- theres always AA..

Or lest we forget:

To LookAtMe: interesting profile..i so do like the fact that u possess "Some college"

Left the pablum and removed the snide innuendo did you? Just thought I'd jog your memory.

I still think you're interesting and provocative. And you haven't really posted anything that terrible. But don't play us the fool. You like to do a bit more than just advice and inform don't you. You like to stick a little jolt in there don't you and be provocative.

Just admit it babe and remind us once in awhile you don't mean any harm. Maybe we should get used to it. But don't disguise your motives. You like to get under people's skin a little when you talk to them don't you?

Andy

P.S. to 1HM. I think your table pics AND NYCHICK's pics are sexy - despite the fact her face is obscured. Both poses are seductive and hers shows enough of her face to see it's pretty but leaves something to the imagination. But don't let that go to your head NYCHICK.



Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 15:38

Andy,

Please don't be to hard on Butter, she actually gave me an idea earlier in one of her posts in which I can make a ton of money from this site! And Andy, you know me with my Entrepreneurial Spirit, if I see a door open, I'm going right through it! Butter, I will get with you at a later date, since you did give me the idea, we'll call it a "finders fee" which you will be entitled to a certain lump sum...I'll keep you posted.

And now back to our regularly scheduled broadcast: Allegedly Rich Women v. More Allegedly Rich Women.



Reply / add comments      Quote      Report abuse   Bookmark and Share
Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 15:21


butterflynjax write:
this is for HOT, & ANDY;
why cant you two just leave people alone?
Once again, the board police are policing the forums, its not right.

they have a right to post their views, just like you do, but you two seem to thrive on going after anyone who doesnt share your same views..

just my thoughts..as Im only reading what you two have written again.
seems like a repeat of last week to me..

have a nice day!!.
oh & by the way im not getting in the middle of it either, just giving my opinion.


Oh Butterfly,

Can't we all just get along? Let's be friends! HM & I just want everyone to like us - no, LOVE us. We want to bring a smile to every thread & a ray of sunshine to every soul we touch - just like you!

So thanks ever so much for your advice!!. It was so sweet & enlightening!! And thanks for not getting in the middle of anything - Again!! Especially after emailing us your apology saying you want to stay out of arguments. But you?ve every right to post your opinion here same as anyone. If you think I'm an overbearing forum policeman you are welcome to state that opinion. Just as I'm free to point out when I think someone is rude or you were wrong about supporting Steve's vicious hypocritical religious attack against 1HM. We're all free to express our opinions & positions here just as you have towards me.

But I don't want to get in the middle of anything either. Oh heavens no. That would mean taking a stand. I don't want any enemies. I want EVERYONE to like me!! I am really sweet you know. 1HM & I certainly wouldn't want a repeat of last week where we helped rid the forum of a vicious manipulative flamer who liked to call women c*nts and wh*ores. Oh sorry, he was a friend of yours? Heard he might be flying to Jacksonville? Yes, I know the truth now.

Have a nice day!!!!!! Peace and love to all!!!!!! Hugs and kisses Butter!!!!!!!!!

XOXO,
Andy

  


Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 14:24

i am not the voice of God- i state my opinion-- if u need to go to therapy afterward well then take a cab and go..

i think the worst thing i said was the chick sittin on furniture and that perhaps another woman should lose her sweater.. now if they are in a tizzy over that...well perhaps less time on millionaire match and more time on therapist chair.. makes sense to me



Reply / add comments      Quote      Report abuse   Bookmark and Share
Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 10:35

yep hm men also can be gold diggers is correct, however i pick and choose carefully.



Reply / add comments      Quote      Report abuse   Bookmark and Share
Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 10:11


statuesque4u write:

Sharp you must take NYChick with a grain of salt she has this truthful personality in which she doesn't think about the 98% of the people who tend to not state so blatantly how to improve someones style of dress or hair. You'll get use to her. She tries to be helpful.



You need to maybe do a little more homework and beware of who you say that too as you never know what the real story might be....Just an observation on that topic.

Good to see you again after so long



S4U I do take her with a grain of salt. The comment re: lose the sweater, well it's a Cashmere Pashmina, and it was cold! :-) Other than my son, it's not like I had some hunk of a man offering to keep me warm! lol

Thanks S4U & 1HM for your comments. I had considered making a reply regarding one shouldn't speak about another's income without knowing first what they are talking about. But decided against it. Thanks again ladies!

  


Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 09:36

this is for HOT, and ANDY;
why cant you two just leave people alone?
Once again, the board police are policing the forums, its not right.

they have a right to post their views, just like you do, but you two seem to thrive on going after anyone who doesnt share your same views..

just my thoughts..as Im only reading what you two have written again.
seems like a repeat of last week to me..

have a nice day!!.
oh and by the way im not getting in the middle of it either, just giving my opinion.

  


Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 03:48

Great posts Andy....thanks for catching my back ;-)



Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 03:37


NYCHICK write:
yes!!! u are right-- let me change my pic today to me sitting on dining room table - my god i will send the men insane,, now what do i do again?? ohhh ok sit there with knees drawn up? thats it? seems easy enough.. and millionaires come running?? ok why are u still sitting on the table then? why arent u sitting on a yacht somewhere?/

hotmamma no i dont recall talkin to u ever sorry i think i would remember -unless u had a prior pic of u not sitting on furniture.. u are right i better change my pic..



Yeah well, I have your previous emails....and I have had the same table pics since last August. I really don't care what you think...do I look upset!? I really don't care if you remember complimenting me before or not, no skin off my nose.

Nope, still sitting on the table and BTW, I do many other things on that table too. It's pretty damned solid & sturdy, if you know what I mean! ;-) I save the bathing suit shots of me on 'yachts' for real men that I have come to know and trust.....not posted for the general public, but thanks for your suggestion!!

  


Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 03:25

I think the point Dawn was trying to make in regard to Sharp and what I hinted at in my post is this: Some of us are considered monetarily rich, but don't flaunt it like other insecure people on this site. Money isn't what defines us as people, so we choose to emphasize the other things that do instead! Those that get invited into our lives find out the truth about our successes.

Just something for you to mull over. I have always found that those that brag about having money, usually don't have any.



Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 03:19

WHEW ANDY! I tell you those post get longer and longer. I am at least glad you write them from top to bottom. I wish they had a counter on this to be able to do that

Hello WEELASSY it's always good to see you. Beautiful as always..:O)

Sharp you must take NYChick with a grain of salt she has this truthful personality in which she doesn't think about the 98% of the people who tend to not state so blatantly how to improve someones style of dress or hair. You'll get use to her. She tries to be helpful.


In the style of NYC, Krystal you should really do a root job on your hair. Those nasty things can really detract from a good head of hair. I know i did mine last night. But thats just a helpful observation:O) Gotta keep those roots hidden you know.

NYC i must just make a wee observation at this statement you made:

sharp
Excuse me? And you would know from experience right, because you know so many rich women

Sharp i stated i am one of the rich women who watch u non rich women basicaly cat fight over a guy who u think has money...

now my advice for u- since i am rich and pretty and u arent..

You need to maybe do a little more homework and beware of who you say that too as you never know what the real story might be....Just an observation on that topic.

Good to see you again after so long

  


Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 03:19


Krystalblue40 write:
You are the rude one here. A not-so-great picture? Men like sexy pictures. Stop being so insecure.



Yes Rude, she is offering Sharp advice based on the one picture she posts on her profile...well, NYC here has only one magazine shot and you can't see her face!! It's not a good shot if you can't really see the person's face.

So stop with the insults...I could be really mean to you as well. I can be pretty good with the insults....

  


Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 03:07


Krystalblue40 write:
Arrogant are we? No need to be. Jealous is a better word.



Jealous of what or whom?? You? A bottle blond that gets off on insulting others?? I think not honey! I am not arrogant, I am confident. There is a huge difference.



Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 02:38


NYCHICK write:
again i did not attack hm i simply stated that sitting on a funiture may not the most appealing shot for her.. i never said she wasnt a good looking woman- i stated my opinion since i was brought up that u dont sit on tables -- and its fine - it seems to bring on the millionaires who find that attractive - may she find the man of her dreams and they have 2 tables-- one for pictures and the other for eating


I DO happen to have 2 tables...one for daily eating and this solid maple for special meals or company in my formal dining room. Besides the story behind why I used the table in the first place is a funny one....but I don't think I would share that on here....or with you.

Besides, the men do love it and 97% of men comment on those shots when they email me.

PS - I am not looking for a millionaire, but he better damned well make as much as I do!! I find I actually have more fun with successful men, not necessarily 'rich' men. Men with my equal drive in life.....so stop assuming every woman on here is looking for a 'rich' man to save her. I make my own way. You state that you are rich, but according to your profile, you are at the same level that I state in mine. Funny thing about that is, that most people that make more than that, state it lower to avoid the exact thing that you are saying.....gold-diggers CAN be men too. Think about it.....:-)



Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 02:29


kwr2002 write:
1HotMama:
I, for one, like the table pictures. Keep them in the portfolio!



Thank you! I appreciate that compliment....I would never take them down based on any woman's suggestion. I get enough compliments in email for me to know that men happen to think they are HOT! ;-)



Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Mon, May 02, 2005 01:49

1HotMama:
I, for one, like the table pictures. Keep them in the portfolio!



Reply / add comments      Quote      Report abuse   Bookmark and Share
Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Sun, May 01, 2005 23:31


NYCHICK write:
ok let me begin by trying to answer some of Ed's questions.. Ed who by the way stated his main reason for this site was to make fun of women who he called gold diggers? correct ed? and then decieded to park and just have fun..
Correct Ed..
ok onto your semi interogation of me



That is an unfair distortion of what I told you in a private email and IMs and I think you may owe me an apology this time.

I told you that my wife first heard about this site (actually it was another one but we didn't realize it at the time) after seeing gold diggers on Dr. Phil. I later saw the show and thought it would be fun to go on the site and taunt them a bit and play some pranks. We're pranksters.

We never did that though because we quickly realized that the people here were mostly decent and we didn't know enough about the people after reading profiles, forums, etc. to do that and feel good about ourselves. So we never did.

However, it does make me feel good to go after jerks anywhere including this site. I won't try to even paint it as altruistic - it's also a selfish pleasure. It would have felt good bringing you down if I had come to the conclusion you were a jerk, which I still might. But when I got information to the contrary that indicated to me that you at least deserved the benefit of the doubt I turned on a dime and apologized to you didn't I? So here is an additional answer too to your question below as to why I spend my time here. I actually enjoy beating up on bullys. A guilty pleasure perhaps but one I freely admit to.



Available only
to logged in members
Posted on Sun, May 01, 2005 23:03


NYCHICK write:
Andy
..now Andy i do hope i answered most of your questions.. now i have one for u

Why did u bother wasting your time with that 4 part series of questions? did u gain insight- are u completing a novel?



Well, thanks(?) for answering my questions. I will try to answer yours with a bit more sincerity/less flippancy (I don't believe a decent person would fire a secretary over a bad hairdoo - and I'm not convinced you're not decent person - but you do seem to like to play games)

My answer to your question is as follows. First I enjoy writing. I was in a hurry and wrote it in under 20 minutes, if it had been better written it would have been shorter. I come on this site periodically when I have some free time and find it entertaining.

More importantly, I saw you making a common mistake I have seen many times in forums and felt that by addressing you I could make a general contribution to this forum that I do care about - at least more than you. There is insufficient moderation of this site so we have to rely on each other to make it a better experience. I planned to reprint it to Mad as Hell but got busy.

I hadn't seen the views I expressed given before and thought some people, like you, might learn something. I later learned from our IM's we just don't see eye to eye on this.

I do plan on writing if and when I ever retire - maybe even before. I would love to write a great and funny Novel. Would love to do something akin to Confederacy of Dunces but my own original thang. But without killing myself before it gets published though like Toole. is this good practice for that Novel? Don't know. You wanna be my subject?