#1 Dating Site for Successful Singles and Admirers
Millionaire Blogs > Dekan09's blogs > I'm back!
I'm back! Sort by:
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1229
Posted on Fri, Nov 16, 2012 20:23

Quoting Curious2078:

Oh, and BTW--what other governments are there out there that believe in a strong monetary policy?

 

None I see on the horizon.  None at all.

 

Do let us know if you know of any.


Switzerland is still pretty good, but they have caved to the US demands thus privacy is at question now...even though there are strong privacy laws in Switzerland.  The US gov. has a long arm.

 


Australian is doing well from what I've heard.

 

Canada, seems to be addressing it's debt problem.

 

If you are a gambler, try Mongolia or Burma.

 

Of course China is rich with dollars...but then the US monetary policy is making those dollars worthless.  China sold us junk and looks like we are ultimately going to be paying with junk.  My worry is that China is secretly buying gold and will call for the removal of the dollar as the worlds currency.  If they can show a percentage backing of the Renminbi with gold, then they would have a valid argument.  Lucky for us the US corporate world has infiltrated China. 

Lastly, to protect your wealth...you could...set up a Foundation in Panama.  You can look up the dynamics of a Foundation.  What does it really matter if you don't own many of your asset personally as long as you can use them in the same manner?



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dekan09
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 464
Posted on Fri, Nov 16, 2012 16:55

Diana is that all there is to her name? Or are there numbers or something else?



Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. President Ronald Reagan

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dekan09
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 464
Posted on Fri, Nov 16, 2012 16:50

Curious you brouth up the military so I'm going to build on that.  I think O is going to try to dismantel it. How many 4 star generals have bit the dust and 1 admiral. We know he doesn't like them. Granted the men themselves did stupid shit stuff, but too many big ones are falling. I think it's going to come to the point where the military will be bad mouthed so much that "the great one" is going to say we don't them any more. Do you guys remember when he first got elected when he said he'd have a civilian army trained just as good as the real army? I think the "real" army would have a tough time turning on the American people. O's civilian one wouldn't think twice about shooting us or throwing us in jail!

 I suppose this is what some would consider a conspiracy theory but he's got to have that control. The "real" military has weapons and they know how to use them, and he can't allow that...therefore get rid of the soldiers  and confiscate their weapons. This probably will be down the road a bit but I truly believe this is very plausible.



Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. President Ronald Reagan

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Jenkneee
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 647
Posted on Fri, Nov 16, 2012 13:29

I agree with you Dekan, Obama does not like U.S. citizens. I was afraid he would get re-elected with all the catering he has done to several groups plus rampant voter fraud. I tend to stay away from politics in these blogs for a few reasons but yours is a good one so I'm joining in. I wish they had a title in the forums of politics, they don't, I checked. A good, informative thread in the forum (not in the blogs) would be useful.

 

One reason why I don't focus too much on politics here is because I usually am not allowed to post links and copy & paste on here. There are other forums I belong to and sites I look at that help me get the real news.  We all have to do our homework to see the real truth of what is going on. We sure aren't going to get it on your evening news!

 

There are several things that bother me about Obummer and our current government and I am happy to see I am not the only one! There are several petitions from citizens of states that want to secede from the United States. If only we could secede and have Ron Paul be our new leader, I would be thrilled!

 I was allowed to copy and paste the following. I am not a paid subscriber so I will not know if my info. will be approved for a day, they sometimes remove my sites.  The following are only two events of many that concerns me. before I get too deep with info., I am going to ask MM if thay make create a new Politics heading in the forums. Obama's executive orders are scary!! At least the ones I am familiar with. Let's start with the NDAA EO. I posted the latest info. below.

1) NDAA- it was Obama's administration who demanded US citizens can be held indefinitely, The latest news on Obama's Executive Order, the NDAA. Please spread the info.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1229
Posted on Thu, Nov 15, 2012 21:05

"PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH"  a concept that Obama just doesn't get.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Curious2078
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2522
Posted on Thu, Nov 15, 2012 19:06

Quoting Dakota35:

Windrider brought up a strong military being a necessity and also a nation showing it's strength.  Well, I'm about to say something that may get me in trouble.  Sometimes people have to die for lives to be saved and Obama's foreign policies may just cause many unnecessary deaths.  Since this has not happen it's all hypothetical on my part.  But let me explain.

  

Let's go back to WWII right after we dropped the 2 bombs on Japan.  We were the strongest nation on the planet.  The war ended and despite countless deaths from the bombs (actually more lives were lost in Japan from incendiary bombs than "the A bombs"), how man lives were spared by the ending of the war?  There was no nation on the planet that dare start a war with the US or any of its allies.  At that point we (the USA) should have secured ourselves by not allowing any hostile countries to get the atomic bomb.  For year our military might stood and other countries feared us.

 

But that is no longer the case.  I actually believe it started (somewhat) when we liberated Iraqi.  Bush said we would see "shock and awe", well I didn't see it and I don't think the world saw it.  Instead we saw a war where America was held accountable for every innocent man, woman, and child that was killed.  I'm not heartless, I say do what you can to limit the loss of innocent lives but it's war...In war the innocent is sometimes killed.  We shouldn't expect our troops to risk their own lives to save the innocent that's between him/her and the enemy.  Sometimes people are in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Sad, but that's life.

 

What should have been done in Iraqi, is to use some larger bombs (MOAB) and leveled cities to dust.  Before such bombs were dropped the citizens should have been given 2 weeks to walk out and surrender.  The media should have been allowed to show the world the complete destruction.  Then once again, we would have been feared.  Fear from other countries decrease the chances of war thus saving lives.

 

Fast forward to today.  Iran is hard at work to get a nuclear bomb.  Israel will not let that happen.  Israel has no confidence in the USA's current administration.  Iran doesn't fear the US so they continue to build their bomb.  If Reagan was president, he would have already bombed Iran's nuclear sights.  And hostile countries knew Reagan would call their bluff.  This was a deterrent against war and probably saved lives.

 

So since now we are viewed as weak, there is a much greater chance of war.  If there is war many more lives will be lost than if we had just shown our might by dropping a few bombs.

 

 



WEAK is the operative word.  How, in the name of everything holy--and even that which is not holy--can anyone in their right mind think that WEAK is good?

 

I don't even want to start in on this idea.  If I do, I will surely go a-ranting so horribly, I will get myself kicked off here. 

 

Suffice it to say that a WEAK military is a sure-fire prescription for disaster.  For any country!!!  And the one we are--or should be--most concerned with is our own.  The USA.

 

Obama is hellbent on a path to our destruction with his idea of weak military.  At the very least--putting our destruction aside for a moment--Obama is hellbent on making us vulnerable to a military takeover by ANY other country out there.  Which, folks, if you haven't been paying attention for the last 5 to 10 years, means a takeover of our country by SHARIA LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

You want your wives and daughters relegated to second--make that third--class citizenship?  They can't drive cars?  They can't pick up the groceries or the dry cleaning?  They can't walk down the street being able to see anything except what is directly in front of them because those "costumes" make it impossible for the eyes behind them to see anything in peripheral vision?

 

Oy.  I'm out of here before I get too mad; too emotional.  Dekan knows what I mean; what I feel.  She feels the same.  Maybe she'll be able to respond more rationally than I can even begin to.  If not--think about why we are so upset that we can't.  Just give that a few moments thought and maybe, just maybe you'll being to see at least a tiny bit of the truth of what is going on in the world right now. 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Curious2078
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2522
Posted on Thu, Nov 15, 2012 18:55

Quoting Dekan09:

Who's Diana?



Go a-searching on the blogs.  You'll find her. 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Curious2078
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2522
Posted on Thu, Nov 15, 2012 18:53

Quoting Dekan09:

Yea honey there's still a couple of us "right wing extremists" out here! I'd like to be proven wrong too but Windrider I don't think that'll happen. Stock up on guns and ammo and canned good. God knows things are going to get so expensive we'll all be on diets!



Dekan, we've got so much rice stocked up here--thanks to the boss--that if you run out of food, you just need to come on up here to our place.  The food won't be medically/nutritionally sound, but it will fill your belly.  And in desperate times, desperate measures are necessary.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1229
Posted on Wed, Nov 14, 2012 17:51

Quoting Curious2078:

No, my friend, Ann Coulter does not need to apologize for calling him a retard.  Do you remember, 4 years ago, when Obama went on Leno, or maybe it was Letterman, and he referred to someone or another--I forget the exact reference--but Obama called someone or a bunch of someones "a retard."

 

Nobody got on HIS case for that.  Nobody.

 

Except, of course, the right wing media. 

 

Her defense of calling Obama a "retard" meaning, as she has said, a LOSER, is just fine with me.  Obama may have won the election--despite having stolen votes [how the heck can 59 voting districts in Philadelphia have no one single vote for Romney????  Huh???!!!!  That is utterly impossible.  Voter fraud, anyone????]

 

As I was saying, Obama may have won the election, but the American people have lost this election big time.  And Obama is, in the strictest sense of the word, a total RETARD.  I used to think he was just purely an evil man intent on turning our country into a Socialist nation.  [Which, BTW, would not only be an evil motive, but a seditious and traitorous intent].  Now, I'm beginning to think that Obama is not only an evil man, but a very, very stupid, ignorant one as well who has absolutely no idea what path he is hellbent on taking our country our down. 

 

As in--if he succeeds in all he wants to do, what will become of his precious daughters?


Hi Curious, I was actually making a joke that it was a insult to retards everwhere to compare them to Obama.  I have no problem with Ann Coulter calling him that, I've called him worse :) .  Obama just doesn't have a clue, he just wants the title of Pres. to pepper his huge ego.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dekan09
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 464
Posted on Wed, Nov 14, 2012 03:30

It's official I'm in love with Dakota!I concur with everything said. I agree 100% innocents do die but it is war. In countries in the Middle East little people grow up to be big terrorists. It is an honor to kill infidels. They certainly are picky when it comes to killing us.Obama has allowed 4 people in Libya to be murdered and I'm afraid  that will be just the tip of the ice burg. My concern is who is going to tell him no? I don't foresee him being disciplined/punished for any misdeed. Look at the voter fraud in this election. They don't plan on doing anything about it. He will get away with everything. Hell I'd not be surprised if he came out one day in his muslim garb! The muslim brotherhood have already been guests in the WH. They're going to be there so much now a room may be named after them! I'm grandsons won't see the country we saw growing up. I con't have time to say more but I'd love to...to be continued.

Thanks for the discussion guys!

 



Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. President Ronald Reagan

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Hoping4Love2000
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1324
Posted on Tue, Nov 13, 2012 20:59

DEKAN.... I am still in shock... Cried all night that night.. Had a meltdown.. Awoke crying again... Apologized for my meltdown.. ... 

 

Life goes on... We must watch very closely... Seems socialism is creeping its way up stream... I will be seeking my "insurance" money to pay for my mandatory "Obamacare" from the first Obama supporter I find.. 

 

I seriously believe there are a lot individuals who need to stick with only voting on American Idol! 

 

TWO THUMBS UP WINDY!! ;)

 

It's unfathoming to me so many remain incredulous to the truth of what is occuring and even think our military needs to shrink... 

 

Where do they think their "free speech" came from? 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Curious2078
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2522
Posted on Tue, Nov 13, 2012 17:55

Quoting Dakota35:

And everyone thought I was pissed when Obama won.

 

 

Look at other blogs on this site, you will see that you are not alone in your opinion.

 

 

I find that I am not at all angry with Obama (well kinda), I am much more angry with the seemingly blind people that voted for him.

 


And did you hear that Ann Coulter called Obama a retard?  I mean how dare her...she needs to apologize to me...and all other retards out there. :)

 

 

What is done is done, so now just protect yourself and loved ones by investing in other governments that believe in a strong monetary policy.  Wait for the fall, then bring your money back.

 

 

 

 



Oh, and BTW--what other governments are there out there that believe in a strong monetary policy?

 

None I see on the horizon.  None at all.

 

Do let us know if you know of any.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Curious2078
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2522
Posted on Tue, Nov 13, 2012 17:53

Quoting Dakota35:

And everyone thought I was pissed when Obama won.

 

 

Look at other blogs on this site, you will see that you are not alone in your opinion.

 

 

I find that I am not at all angry with Obama (well kinda), I am much more angry with the seemingly blind people that voted for him.

 


And did you hear that Ann Coulter called Obama a retard?  I mean how dare her...she needs to apologize to me...and all other retards out there. :)

 

 

What is done is done, so now just protect yourself and loved ones by investing in other governments that believe in a strong monetary policy.  Wait for the fall, then bring your money back.

 

 

 

 



No, my friend, Ann Coulter does not need to apologize for calling him a retard.  Do you remember, 4 years ago, when Obama went on Leno, or maybe it was Letterman, and he referred to someone or another--I forget the exact reference--but Obama called someone or a bunch of someones "a retard."

 

Nobody got on HIS case for that.  Nobody.

 

Except, of course, the right wing media. 

 

Her defense of calling Obama a "retard" meaning, as she has said, a LOSER, is just fine with me.  Obama may have won the election--despite having stolen votes [how the heck can 59 voting districts in Philadelphia have no one single vote for Romney????  Huh???!!!!  That is utterly impossible.  Voter fraud, anyone????]

 

As I was saying, Obama may have won the election, but the American people have lost this election big time.  And Obama is, in the strictest sense of the word, a total RETARD.  I used to think he was just purely an evil man intent on turning our country into a Socialist nation.  [Which, BTW, would not only be an evil motive, but a seditious and traitorous intent].  Now, I'm beginning to think that Obama is not only an evil man, but a very, very stupid, ignorant one as well who has absolutely no idea what path he is hellbent on taking our country our down. 

 

As in--if he succeeds in all he wants to do, what will become of his precious daughters?



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Curious2078
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2522
Posted on Tue, Nov 13, 2012 17:41

TO WINDRIDER: 

Grand post, Windrider. Thank you indeed. At least there are 3 of us ready to be part of the Militia!

[ps: I've tried to post this to Windrider twice now, and it keeps coming up as a response to V.  Let it be known this is a response to WINDRIDER for sure.]  



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dekan09
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 464
Posted on Tue, Nov 13, 2012 04:21

Yea honey there's still a couple of us "right wing extremists" out here! I'd like to be proven wrong too but Windrider I don't think that'll happen. Stock up on guns and ammo and canned good. God knows things are going to get so expensive we'll all be on diets!



Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. President Ronald Reagan

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dekan09
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 464
Posted on Tue, Nov 13, 2012 04:19

Hey you! Nice to hear from you too. I wonder when the haters will rear their ugly heads? *L* I don't really care any more and I will die being politically incorrect! Off to work so someone else can stay in bed!



Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. President Ronald Reagan

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    1 up Bookmark and Share
Dekan09
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 464
Posted on Tue, Nov 13, 2012 04:18

The people who didn't want to lose their good came out in force. I probably would have too. It doesn't scare me where Obama's from, I'm scared of where he lives now and for another 4. White people didn't get up off their lazy asses and go out and vote. So I don't want to hear their bitching and moaning! But those who did vote for him and things get worse...oh you bet your sweet ass I will be the one to say I told you so!



Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. President Ronald Reagan

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dekan09
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 464
Posted on Tue, Nov 13, 2012 04:14

Who's Diana?



Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives. President Ronald Reagan

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1229
Posted on Tue, Nov 13, 2012 00:59

Windrider brought up a strong military being a necessity and also a nation showing it's strength.  Well, I'm about to say something that may get me in trouble.  Sometimes people have to die for lives to be saved and Obama's foreign policies may just cause many unnecessary deaths.  Since this has not happen it's all hypothetical on my part.  But let me explain.

  

Let's go back to WWII right after we dropped the 2 bombs on Japan.  We were the strongest nation on the planet.  The war ended and despite countless deaths from the bombs (actually more lives were lost in Japan from incendiary bombs than "the A bombs"), how man lives were spared by the ending of the war?  There was no nation on the planet that dare start a war with the US or any of its allies.  At that point we (the USA) should have secured ourselves by not allowing any hostile countries to get the atomic bomb.  For year our military might stood and other countries feared us.

 

But that is no longer the case.  I actually believe it started (somewhat) when we liberated Iraqi.  Bush said we would see "shock and awe", well I didn't see it and I don't think the world saw it.  Instead we saw a war where America was held accountable for every innocent man, woman, and child that was killed.  I'm not heartless, I say do what you can to limit the loss of innocent lives but it's war...In war the innocent is sometimes killed.  We shouldn't expect our troops to risk their own lives to save the innocent that's between him/her and the enemy.  Sometimes people are in the wrong place at the wrong time.  Sad, but that's life.

 

What should have been done in Iraqi, is to use some larger bombs (MOAB) and leveled cities to dust.  Before such bombs were dropped the citizens should have been given 2 weeks to walk out and surrender.  The media should have been allowed to show the world the complete destruction.  Then once again, we would have been feared.  Fear from other countries decrease the chances of war thus saving lives.

 

Fast forward to today.  Iran is hard at work to get a nuclear bomb.  Israel will not let that happen.  Israel has no confidence in the USA's current administration.  Iran doesn't fear the US so they continue to build their bomb.  If Reagan was president, he would have already bombed Iran's nuclear sights.  And hostile countries knew Reagan would call their bluff.  This was a deterrent against war and probably saved lives.

 

So since now we are viewed as weak, there is a much greater chance of war.  If there is war many more lives will be lost than if we had just shown our might by dropping a few bombs.

 

 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Curious2078
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2522
Posted on Mon, Nov 12, 2012 07:56

Hello Dekan!

 

According to the US Fish & Wildlife service, 14,974,534 hunting licenses were issued in this country in 2011.  Obviously figures aren't in for 2012, but it's a good bet most of the 2011 hunters bought licenses in 2012.  If even half of these hunters are ready to stand on principle, we've already got a pretty good militia at the ready right now.

 

And then there's the rest of the legally-sanctioned gun owners who keep arms and ammo for self-protection and protection of our families and homes.

 

Oh, and recently a State Rep. in Vermont proposed that any person [or perhaps it was household] NOT owning a gun would have to pay a $500 fine.  Amazing, eh what?  I love it.

 

That said, good to see you here stirring up the political pot.  Folks may not like what you have to say, but nobody can accuse you of pulling punches or employing political correctness. 

 

Three Cheers!!! 

 

 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    1 up Bookmark and Share
Follow - Email me when people comment