#1 Dating Site for Successful Singles and Admirers
Millionaire Blogs > DONTFITMOLD's blogs > actually true
actually true Sort by:
Author
DONTFITMOLD Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1383
Posted on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 22:00

 

 

 


Available only
to logged in members

D ( @ )( @ )

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Diana3316
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1187
Posted on Sun, Oct 28, 2012 14:06

How can this be true?


Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Diana3316
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1187
Posted on Sun, Oct 28, 2012 12:20

Quoting Curious2078:

I forgot to mention--I got so carried away with your emotionalism:

 

Romney has no intention of doing away with Roe vs. Wade.  All he has expressed are his personal views.  His very own personal views for himself and his family.

 

Get a grip, Don.  The last thing Romney is concerned with is Roe vs. Wade.  He's far more focused on the economy and foreign policy than he is on R v. W.  He's a very smart man who knows that such things as Roe vs. Wade are the last thing we need to be looking at right now.  And such things are definitely the last things he is concerned with. 

 

Where the heck you liberals get off worrying about such petty--yes, petty, relatively speaking--stuff is beyond me, when the most serious issues we are facing right now are economic stability/instability and global survival due to Islamic terrorism, is beyond me. 

 

 


Pat~

 How do YOU KNOW what he will do on Roe v Wade? He’s had about 5 different positions from supporting a woman’s right to choose; to I’d be “delighted” to sign legislation banning abortion. How does anyone know what he stands for or what he will do? He’s like a well-oiled weather vane. I suppose you can look away from the future generations of young women who will live in a world were men tell them what to do with their bodies…..well ok….hopefully other women will not.

 

 I’m not so sure that a country is the same thing as a company. I think I require more of my president than just to be a CEO. A hollow stare and an uncomfortable smile…..I can’t tell that he feels anything!

 

To this day, Mitt Romney has shown very little interest, or for that matter any skill for foreign policy. Every time he has done or said anything about foreign policy it’s been a disaster. They called him a TWIT in England. He doesn’t seem to know anything nor does he seem to care.

The President doesn’t get to opt out of foreign policy if it’s not his thing. GW Bush didn’t want to be a foreign policy president…..so we got Dick Cheney. Now since Romney doesn’t really have a clue either…..he’s brought 17 of that exact same crew to guide his foreign policy. Can you say WAR???? The cowboy diplomacy didn’t work so hot for Bush and I doubt the spoiled, rude, bully CEO will work either.

Seriously though……If Mitt Romney wants to be Commander in Chief he should mention the troops in his speeches and have at least basic working knowledge of geography. He has an iPad doesn’t he?????


Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
DONTFITMOLD Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1383
Posted on Sat, Oct 27, 2012 12:49

Hope the final choices dont leave us with this as our option


Available only
to logged in members

D ( @ )( @ )

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Curious2078
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2531
Posted on Fri, Oct 26, 2012 21:53

Quoting DONTFITMOLD:

 

 

A Constitutionalist? Excuse me... freedom and right to self-determination...liberty...thought? Right to determine what to do with body and life? Right to expect equal rights / pay...Roe V Wade in Romney's Supreme Court will take women's right back to the back room coat hanger abortions of the 50's..

 

Getting rid of Pell Grants, food stamps, and assistence will appear like the starving predator at the back door.

 

Social Consciousness over Greed can and will only keep our nation compassionate  

 

Absolute Power currupts Absolutely

 

Wealth's only desire is more wealth



I forgot to mention--I got so carried away with your emotionalism:

 

Romney has no intention of doing away with Roe vs. Wade.  All he has expressed are his personal views.  His very own personal views for himself and his family.

 

Get a grip, Don.  The last thing Romney is concerned with is Roe vs. Wade.  He's far more focused on the economy and foreign policy than he is on R v. W.  He's a very smart man who knows that such things as Roe vs. Wade are the last thing we need to be looking at right now.  And such things are definitely the last things he is concerned with. 

 

Where the heck you liberals get off worrying about such petty--yes, petty, relatively speaking--stuff is beyond me, when the most serious issues we are facing right now are economic stability/instability and global survival due to Islamic terrorism, is beyond me. 

 

 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Curious2078
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2531
Posted on Fri, Oct 26, 2012 21:27

Quoting DONTFITMOLD:

 

 

A Constitutionalist? Excuse me... freedom and right to self-determination...liberty...thought? Right to determine what to do with body and life? Right to expect equal rights / pay...Roe V Wade in Romney's Supreme Court will take women's right back to the back room coat hanger abortions of the 50's..

 

Getting rid of Pell Grants, food stamps, and assistence will appear like the starving predator at the back door.

 

Social Consciousness over Greed can and will only keep our nation compassionate  

 

Absolute Power currupts Absolutely

 

Wealth's only desire is more wealth



With all due respect, Don, BS in spades.  You don't know what the heck you're talking about.  There isn't one coherent, clear-thiniking idea in what you just said.  Just a lot of emotional knee-jerking.

On that note, I'll conclude because if I don't, I will rant on so emotionally myself, I will get thrown off this site as soon as my words are read.

Suffice it to say you truly do not know what you are talking about.  You haven't thought any of your ideas through clearly at all.  That is obvious to anyone with enough of a brain to actually think for themselves rather than knee-jerking to liberal media talking points.

Regardless of who wins the November election, I wish you the very best.  But if Romney wins, I hope to God you're not one of those Obamaites who is counting on him giving you a new iPod for "free."

 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
DONTFITMOLD Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1383
Posted on Wed, Oct 24, 2012 21:02

Quoting Curious2078:

As much as it scares you to think of having Romney as "Commander in Chief," Don--no matter how much your fear is--I am 10 times as scared of having Obama as our Commander in Chief for the next 4 years.

 

The question comes down to this, very simply.  Do you want a Constitutionalist in the White House, or do you want a president intent on "fundamentally transforming America [Obama's own words], which we all now know for sure means turning us into a Socialist Nation wherein our beloved Constitution means nothing at all; stands for nothing; is as good as dog poop tossed into the Hudson River and allowed to float out to sea undetected.



 

 

A Constitutionalist? Excuse me... freedom and right to self-determination...liberty...thought? Right to determine what to do with body and life? Right to expect equal rights / pay...Roe V Wade in Romney's Supreme Court will take women's right back to the back room coat hanger abortions of the 50's..

 

Getting rid of Pell Grants, food stamps, and assistence will appear like the starving predator at the back door.

 

Social Consciousness over Greed can and will only keep our nation compassionate  

 

Absolute Power currupts Absolutely

 

Wealth's only desire is more wealth



D ( @ )( @ )

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Windrider735
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 256
Posted on Wed, Oct 24, 2012 20:35

I have to agree with Curious. The results of this upcoming election will either allow us to hold on to our Freedoms or blast the cornerstones this Nation was founded on into oblivion, and we can watch everything America stands for disappear forever. Sometimes we're forced to vote for the person who will do the least amount of harm because we have no other choices. I'd rather survive and then concentrate on making changes than to vote a man in I believe with all my heart is intent on bringing this Nation to her knees and doing away with everything our ancestors fought so hard to gain and our men and women in the service fight so hard to keep.   Politics is a dirty game. Those at the top look down and see a bunch of sh**heads, and those on the bottom look up and see nothing but a bunch of a**holes.

Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
rmac22
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 810
Posted on Wed, Oct 24, 2012 10:46

One thing that scares me is that people take these fool debates seriously.  Debates prove nothing.  They have little if anything to do with who would make the best president. 

 

They are not even good at selecting the best debater.   

 

About their only virtue is they just might maybe expose stupidity beyond the ordinary.  I should think by the time we have gotten past the primaries stupidity or lack thereof should be well established. 

 

We should not be electing presidents with a game show mentality, and a game show is just about what these debates are.  Game shows can’t even select the best dancer. 

 

RMac

 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Curious2078
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2531
Posted on Tue, Oct 23, 2012 21:26

Quoting DONTFITMOLD:

Lynn college debate

It  scares me to think of having Romney as "THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF".



As much as it scares you to think of having Romney as "Commander in Chief," Don--no matter how much your fear is--I am 10 times as scared of having Obama as our Commander in Chief for the next 4 years.

 

The question comes down to this, very simply.  Do you want a Constitutionalist in the White House, or do you want a president intent on "fundamentally transforming America [Obama's own words], which we all now know for sure means turning us into a Socialist Nation wherein our beloved Constitution means nothing at all; stands for nothing; is as good as dog poop tossed into the Hudson River and allowed to float out to sea undetected.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    1 up Bookmark and Share
DONTFITMOLD Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1383
Posted on Mon, Oct 22, 2012 20:47

Lynn college debate

It  scares me to think of having Romney as "THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF".



D ( @ )( @ )

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
DONTFITMOLD Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1383
Posted on Mon, Oct 22, 2012 05:08

Steve McCann is a writer who has Contributed to American Thinker that appears to be a Anti Obama group that has  nothing positive to say ....

John Porter is a retired republican.......Dahhh

 Dont believe all you see...none of what you read.

I have a bridge in NYC that CaltoTx might invest in

 

Granted Obama has not responded to all the debate issues with all the facts. In defence he also has a job to pay attention to rather than Romneys full time outsourcing of American jobs to China and his quest for the Whitehouse

 

I will agree with Annette on one issue....The survival of the American way of life will be in the results of this election. One way or the other

 



D ( @ )( @ )

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Diana3316
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1187
Posted on Sun, Oct 21, 2012 09:21

Regarding the Filibuster-Proof Majority:

 

 Ted Kennedy’s temporary replacement wasn’t sworn in until Sept 24 of 2009, giving Democrats a filibuster-proof majority for exactly four months and one week, until Rep Scott Brown filled the seat after a special election.

 

The claim that Obama ruled like a monarch over Congress for two years—endlessly serenaded as a Republican talking point—is more than just misremembering.  But rather than call it a lie…I’ll just say that it is bat crap crazy.

It’s meant to represent that Obama had his chance to try his ideas and obscure and deny the relentless GOP obstructionism and Democratic factionalism he’s encountered since Day One.  I guess if you repeat something over and over…..some people believe it.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Diana3316
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1187
Posted on Sat, Oct 20, 2012 23:46

CAto~

Who are John Porter and Steve McCann??  I googled them but all I found was a retired Congressman and Aussie bike rider.

 

Seriously?? You really believe that President Obama's "life long goal" is to transform us into his slaves working on his government plantation?

 

Would the rescued auto industry be an example of one of those government plantations?  I haven't heard of any protesting slaves or government crack downs in Ohio.  Do you have any other examples of government plantations that might be in the works???  Maybe the healthcare industry?  Hmmm.....all those doctors, administrators, therapists and nurses being turned into slaves in the next four years????  It sounds very frightening indeed!     We should all be totally freaked out by this evil plan!!!   OMG......Wow! 

 

 

 

 


Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Diana3316
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1187
Posted on Sat, Oct 20, 2012 21:14

One small business owner said, "We don't need more tax cuts; we need customers". 

 

Why won't Congress pass the American Jobs Act or the Keep Jobs in America Bill????  Oh the Republicans filibustered both .....obstructing progress as usual.  They certainly don't want the unemployment figure to go down lower.  It might look like Obama really does understand how the economy works.  To hell with struggling working families!


Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    1 up Bookmark and Share
DONTFITMOLD Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1383
Posted on Sat, Oct 20, 2012 15:05

Interesting view into a "presidental" personality Maybe his ailment has yet another name. "homohewrecked us"

 

RIP John Lauber ???-2002


Available only
to logged in members

D ( @ )( @ )

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
DONTFITMOLD Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1383
Posted on Sat, Oct 20, 2012 14:42

And Another Thang.....LOL

 

When Romney was in "65" high school. He orgainzed a posse to attack a Gay student take him down and cut the kids long hair....Hummm wonder if the boy really grew up?????? sound like sumkinda familiar in this day and age...lol


Available only
to logged in members

D ( @ )( @ )

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
CAtoTXWoman
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2
Posted on Sat, Oct 20, 2012 14:23

 

This is not about PARTY, this is about the survival of AMERICA as we know it. God bless AMERICA!    
Annette

What you are about to read is accurate and it is scary.



From: John Porter

To: Americans everywhere



I was sitting at my keyboard halfway through my writing a letter to you about how Barack Obama was fulfilling his pledge to "Transform America" by "Changing the fundamentals of America," so that our government would become the plantation, he the owner, and we the slaves, when this article by Steve McCann appeared in my in box. After checking it for accuracy, and finding it to be so, I put my writing on hold and here present it to you, for I could not say it better.



Obama's Second Term Transformation Plans



The 2012 election has often been described as the most pivotal since 1860.This statement is not hyperbole. If Barack Obama is re-elected the United States will never be the same, nor will it be able to re-capture its once lofty status as the most dominant nation in the history of mankind.



The overwhelming majority of Americans do not understand that Obama's first term was dedicated to putting in place executive power to enable him and the administration to fulfill the campaign promise of "transforming America " in his second term regardless of which political party controls Congress. That is why his re-election team is virtually ignoring the plight of incumbent or prospective Democratic Party office holders.



The most significant accomplishment of Obama's first term was to make Congress irrelevant. Under the myopic and blindly loyal leadership of Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi, the Democrats have succeeded in creating an imperial and, in a second term, a potential dictatorial presidency.



During the first two years of the Obama administration when the Democrats overwhelming controlled both Houses of Congress and the media was in an Obama worshipping stupor, a myriad of laws were passed and actions taken which transferredvirtually unlimited power to the executive branch.



The birth of multi-thousand page laws was not an aberration. This tactic was adopted so the bureaucracy controlled by Obama appointees would have sole discretion in interpreting vaguely written laws and enforcing thousands of pages of regulations they and not Congress would subsequently write.



For example, in the 2,700 pages of ObamaCare there are more than 2,500 references to the Secretary of Health and Human Services. There are more than 700 instances when he or she is instructed that they "shall" do something and more than 200 times when they "may" take at their sole discretion some form of regulatory action. On 139 occasions, the law mentions that the "Secretary determines." In essence one person, appointed by and reporting to the president, will be in charge of the health care of 310 million Americans once ObamaCare is fully operational in 2014.



The same is true in the 2,319 pages of the Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Act which confers nearly unlimited power on various agencies to control by fiat the nation's financial, banking and investment sectors. The bill also creates new agencies, such as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, not subject to any oversight by Congress. This overall process was repeated numerous times with other legislation all with the intent of granting unfettered power to the executive branch controlled by Barack Obama and his radical associates.



Additionally, the Obama administration has, through its unilaterally determined rule making and regulatory powers, created laws out of whole cloth. The Environmental Protection Agency on a near daily basis issues new regulations clearly out of their purview in order to modify and change environmental laws previously passed and to impose a radical green agenda never approved by Congress. The same is true of the Energy and Interior Departments among many others.



None of these extra-constitutional actions have been challenged by Congress. The left in America knows this usurpation of power is nearly impossible to reverse unless stopped in its early stages.



It is clearly the mindset of this administration and its appointees that Congress is merely a nuisance and can be ignored after they were able to take full advantage of the useful idiots in the Democrat controlled House and Senate in 2009-2010 and the Democrat Senate in the current Congress.



Additionally, Barack Obama knows after his re-election a Republican controlled House and Senate will not be able to enact any legislation to roll back the power previously granted to the Executive Branch or usurped by them. His veto will not be overridden as there will always be at least 145 Democratic members of the House or 34 in the Senate in agreement with or intimidated by an administration more than willing to use Chicago style political tactics.



The stalemate between the Executive and Legislative Branches will inure to the benefit of Barack Obama and his fellow leftists.



The most significant power Congress has is the control of the purse-strings as all spending must be approved by them. However, once re-elected, Barack Obama, as confirmed by his willingness to do or say anything and his unscrupulous re-election tactics, would not only threaten government shutdowns but would deliberately withhold payments to those dependent on government support as a means of intimidating and forcing a Republican controlled Congress to surrender to his demands, thus neutering their ability to control the administration through spending constraints.



Further, this administration has shown contempt for the courts by ignoring various court orders, e.g. the Gulf of Mexico oil drilling moratorium, as well as stonewalling subpoenas and requests issued by Congress. The Eric Holder Justice Department has become the epitome of corruption as part of the most dishonest and deceitful administration in American history. In a second term the arrogance of Barack Obama and his minions will become more blatant as he will not have to be concerned with re-election.



Who will be there to enforce the rule of law, a Supreme Court ruling or the Constitution? No one. Barack Obama and his fellow-travelers will be unchallenged as they run roughshod over the American people.



Many Republicans and conservatives dissatisfied with the prospect of Mitt Romney as the nominee for president are insteadfocused on re-taking the House and Senate. That goal, while worthy and necessary, is meaningless unless Barack Obama is defeated . The nation is not dealing with a person of character and integrity but someone of single-minded purpose and overwhelming narcissism. Judging by his actions, words and deeds during his first term, he does not intend to work with Congress, either Republican or Democrat in his second term but rather to force his radical agenda on the American people through the power he has usurped or been granted.



The governmental structure of the United States was set up by the founders in the hope that over the years only those people of high moral character and integrity would assume the reins of power. However, knowing that was not always possible, they dispersed power over three distinct and independent branches as a check on each other.



What they could not imagine is the surrender and abdication of its constitutional duty by the preeminent governmental branch, the Congress, to a chief executive devoid of any character or integrity coupled with a judiciary essentially powerless to enforce the law when the chief executive ignores them.



Conservatives, Libertarians, the Republican Party and Mitt Romney must come to grips with this moment in time and their historical role in denying Barack Obama and his minions their ultimate goal. All resources must be directed at that end-game and not merely controlling Congress and the various committee chairmanships.



Steve McCann

May 12, 2012



I would add but 6 words to those above mentioned, Conservatives, Libertarians, the Republican Party and Mitt Romney, to say "and we the American people," must also come to grips with this moment in time and our role in denying Barack Obama his life long goal of "transforming" us into his slaves working on his government plantation.


Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
DONTFITMOLD Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1383
Posted on Sat, Oct 20, 2012 14:07

Sketchy politics....Shady proposals. Danger Will Robonson


Available only
to logged in members

D ( @ )( @ )

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Diana3316
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1187
Posted on Sat, Oct 20, 2012 11:26

Too true to be funny!


Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Follow - Email me when people comment