#1 Dating Site for Successful Singles and Admirers
Millionaire Blogs > SpeedDallas's blogs > Food for thought
Food for thought Sort by:
Author
SpeedDallas Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 46
Posted on Sun, Jun 23, 2013 08:24

Look around the animal Kingdom. What you will find is with most animal species it is the male that is naturally, thru selection, more physically attractive. This is somewhat subjective, but generally considered to be the case.

We humans, animals that we are, can be argued are likewise. At least naturally. Both genders do all sorts of things such as shaving, make up, augmentation, working out, ect... that attempt to improve our looks, but naturally, as with most animal species, if unbiased by gender attraction it is the male again.

 

So how does that apply to MM you wonder.

 

In the US about one in 10 households have a net woth of 1 million or more. By far most those households are lead by a male member, over 55, and married. All that said, think of the likelyhood of finding a single attractive male with a net worth over a million. Do some math, and understand there are far more attractive women than millionaire single men. Think how in demand an attractive, younger, millionaire male is.

 

Good luck in your search.

 

 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    1 up Bookmark and Share
Lillybuttons
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1
Posted on Sat, Oct 12, 2013 03:06

I kind of agree with you but have to say that as I'm just hitting 31 I feel that I look better as the years go on think this is because I have a baby face so at last I'm looking over 20 , I'm like a fine wine I only get better with years xx 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Timeless2009
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1
Posted on Sat, Sep 14, 2013 20:29

Most animal species it is the male that is naturally, thru selection, more physically attractive. This is somewhat subjective, but generally considered to be the case.  

I gave quite a bit of thought to your analogy of th animal kingdom hierarchy and how that relates to MM and just had to do some due diligence if you will. On the whole I get it......we are attratched to the males that are physicallly attractive however must bring something other than that to the table. It is my experience that the males that are physically attractive the female species sees as him as strong, protecting and fierce. I do not study monkeys however it sort of makes sence to me with the survival of the fitest mantra.

 

We humans, animals that we are, can be argued are likewise. At least naturally. Both genders do all sorts of things such as shaving, make up, augmentation, working out, ect... that attempt to improve our looks, but naturally, as with most animal species, if unbiased by gender attraction it is the male again. Again what is different is " critical thinking skills" we (women) and I can only speak on my own gender to please excuse the bias. Women see a man who takes good care in him self,,,appearance etc and we micro cross examine that and like to think or assume or hope that this is how he treats everything in his life but most of all he is indicating what he expects his partner to be on the same page with. When I see a successful male confident and well groomed I am immediately attracted to him but not so much on the outer shell as more inside this man I feel is strong, chivalrous and basically "ready for anything" I think in my humble opinion that is the difference. Now clearly there is more married men worth millions that women seeking such but once again let us not forget that we look for what fills our voids at certain times some last forever some it takes a few times to get it right.


Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Tea2013
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1
Posted on Tue, Jul 30, 2013 06:04

Amen!



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
SpeedDallas Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 46
Posted on Wed, Jul 17, 2013 06:19

I can't speak for others, but insecure women for me are no fun and over a short period of time I wiill determine not for me. Doesn't matter what they look like. I do not like the job of attempting to constantly prop up one's ego. Have to come with one included. I've found many very attractive women are insecure. They tie their entire worth to their looks and feel as time goes by their worth diminishes. I'd say this is why women often are overly concerned when they turn 30, 40, 50, and men less so. I think it also explains why outside of US, you go to the beach, and see fat, hairy, older dudes wearing speedos and few over 30 women in a tiny bikini.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1229
Posted on Wed, Jul 17, 2013 05:15

Quoting SpeedDallas:

You asked me what I thought wealthy was. I answered. You didn't ask me what I thought Bill Gates thought was wealthy. I can't speak for Bill, and frankly if you asked him you might be surprised what his answer is as he is bright enough to know he is in the extreme as to wealth. App. 10% of the US populace has a net worth of 1 million or more and far less 2 million in liquid assets. As noted, attractive is subjective, and an advertisement purposely made to show the rough side of any actor doesn't change that. Watch the movie Snatch and then Troy and I think that point will be easy to understand. 

 

 

 

I'd add confidence is what people often attribute to being attractive in others. How one enters a room, eye contact ect...Putting one's own looks down on a consistent basis, for what ever purpose , if one, will not serve the person well in attracting the opposite sex.



Fair enough, I did ask you and you answered...I would argue that wealth is also subjective to a large extent.  But I did ask you specifically.  If I were asked the same question, I would say 10 million would make me feel secure.  As long as I wasn't a idiot and spent it on stupid stuff.

 

I think confidence works more with women than men.  Men tend to be just drawn to looks.  A hot shy librarian will get just as many men or more than a similar girl with confidence.  I say more because a man will detect her shyness and think he has a better chance.  You are correct about "putting ones looks down on a consistent basis".  Sometimes people that do that, don't really care because they know they can easily find someone if they really put a effort into it....and they don't want to come across as conceited especially when they are already very opinionated.  And they very well might have had events happen in their life where maybe they just don't want anyone.  Just speculating...you know some people are just a little crazy. :)



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
SpeedDallas Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 46
Posted on Tue, Jul 16, 2013 07:31

You asked me what I thought wealthy was. I answered. You didn't ask me what I thought Bill Gates thought was wealthy. I can't speak for Bill, and frankly if you asked him you might be surprised what his answer is as he is bright enough to know he is in the extreme as to wealth. App. 10% of the US populace has a net worth of 1 million or more and far less 2 million in liquid assets. As noted, attractive is subjective, and an advertisement purposely made to show the rough side of any actor doesn't change that. Watch the movie Snatch and then Troy and I think that point will be easy to understand. 

 

 

 

I'd add confidence is what people often attribute to being attractive in others. How one enters a room, eye contact ect...Putting one's own looks down on a consistent basis, for what ever purpose , if one, will not serve the person well in attracting the opposite sex.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1229
Posted on Mon, Jul 15, 2013 17:50

Quoting SpeedDallas:

I'd say 2 million of liqiud assets is wealthy. I don't know of anyone who considers 100k as wealthy. Is a decent yearly salary, depending on where one lives, but wealthy as to net worth? No. Compared to most of the US populace, better off than? Sure, but wealthy? No.

 

 

 

Attractive is subjective. What I think some, mostly males, struggle with is differentiating between attractive males and being attracted to said males. May be a case of homophobia or fear of ridicule for stating what they feel. For instance while I'm not attracted to Brad Pitt, he is clearly an attractive human. Women on the other hand tend to say their female friends are attractive when often they are not. I suppose a bonding thing. Who hasn't heard the cliche' all women are beautiful. No they are not. And all men aren't handsome. 



Someone like Bill Gates would say that 2m is pocket change.  Some young girl working at Walmart would find a man that had 100K to be well off.  2 million is not that much money.  If one was to lazy around and spend freely, 2m would disappear rather quickly.  I could spend that much in one purchase (not that I have it, and if I did, I wouldn't say).  I've been eyeing a sailing cat (Matrix 760).  But sometimes dreams are better dreams than reality.

 

Women definitely don't know if other women are attractive.  But men must be the same, because I've had men get jealous of me and I look like a skinny toad.  I personally don't think Brad Pitt is good looking.  Did you see his latest commercial?  Looks like he hasn't groomed in months. :)  And no, all women are not physically beautiful, nor men. Agreed.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
SpeedDallas Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 46
Posted on Mon, Jul 15, 2013 11:24

I'd say 2 million of liqiud assets is wealthy. I don't know of anyone who considers 100k as wealthy. Is a decent yearly salary, depending on where one lives, but wealthy as to net worth? No. Compared to most of the US populace, better off than? Sure, but wealthy? No.

 

 

 

Attractive is subjective. What I think some, mostly males, struggle with is differentiating between attractive males and being attracted to said males. May be a case of homophobia or fear of ridicule for stating what they feel. For instance while I'm not attracted to Brad Pitt, he is clearly an attractive human. Women on the other hand tend to say their female friends are attractive when often they are not. I suppose a bonding thing. Who hasn't heard the cliche' all women are beautiful. No they are not. And all men aren't handsome. 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1229
Posted on Fri, Jul 12, 2013 20:43

Quoting SpeedDallas:

PS. When did this blog "officially" become high-jacked?

 

Almost from day 1. The point of the thread was that there are very few wealthy, attractive, under 60 year old men, who are not married and thusly difficult to find one.

 

As part of the set up to that thought I mentioned that in the animal kingdom males are generally more attractive than females and thusly it might be assumed that is likewise in we talking monkeys. That was a positive, if true, for females, but no one agreed  That seemed to turn the thread into whether men or women are more attractive. Ironically, if true that women are more attractive to men,  that opinion basically adds to my original point as it says there are more attractive females than males in the population, hence more competition for the low number of young wealthy attractive single men. Then it moved to pedicures and now to where it currently resides. Pretty comical.



Define: wealthy.   Define: attractive  I get the 60 year old men thing.  Some think 100 grand is wealth, and beauty is a matter of taste.  For me, women are infinitely more attractive than men.
 
I'm ready to get back on the subject of this blog as Hoping has no shame in posting these photos of me.  Why can't she just lie and post something that would make me look good?  Although, I'd like to keep the sexy feet pictures coming.

 

 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1229
Posted on Fri, Jul 12, 2013 20:33

Quoting Hoping4Love2000:

DAKOTA!! DON'T MAKE ME TELL YOU TWICE, OR I WILL DRAG OUT YOUR BABY PICS AND THAT DREADED PHOTO OF YOUR EARS, DEAR!! 

 

 

 

Oh, Jeez... I might as well share!! Bwahahahahaha!! 

 

DAKOTA--- 1973 (Yes, he has always had an attitude!!) 



Someone already beat you to posting that picture of me...I don't remember who it was, but it was awhile back.  I was a cute kid!!!  I just got uglier as a grew older.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Hoping4Love2000
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1323
Posted on Fri, Jul 12, 2013 11:41

Quoting Dakota35:

That's just not right!!!  I didn't give you permission to take my photo or put it on the internet for the world to see.  What's wrong with a man liking pink bunny pajamas?  And for your info, I think the ears are just fine.  It's just sad that you had to out me.  This is really going to effect my self esteem.  I don't care, I'm still going to wear them.  I'm so angry!!!   


DAKOTA!! DON'T MAKE ME TELL YOU TWICE, OR I WILL DRAG OUT YOUR BABY PICS AND THAT DREADED PHOTO OF YOUR EARS, DEAR!! 

 

 

 

Oh, Jeez... I might as well share!! Bwahahahahaha!! 

 

DAKOTA--- 1973 (Yes, he has always had an attitude!!) 


Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Hoping4Love2000
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1323
Posted on Fri, Jul 12, 2013 11:35

Quoting SpeedDallas:

PS. When did this blog "officially" become high-jacked?

 

Almost from day 1. The point of the thread was that there are very few wealthy, attractive, under 60 year old men, who are not married and thusly difficult to find one.

 

As part of the set up to that thought I mentioned that in the animal kingdom males are generally more attractive than females and thusly it might be assumed that is likewise in we talking monkeys. That was a positive, if true, for females, but no one agreed  That seemed to turn the thread into whether men or women are more attractive. Ironically, if true that women are more attractive to men,  that opinion basically adds to my original point as it says there are more attractive females than males in the population, hence more competition for the low number of young wealthy attractive single men. Then it moved to pedicures and now to where it currently resides. Pretty comical.



WELCOME TO THE BOARDS SPEED!! ;)

 

HI-JACKING around here has commenced since the beginning of time! 

 

You should pop over to our "Blog of NOTHNG!" That blog cannot be officially "HI-jacked" as I purposely set it up that way! When a blonde walks in a room speaking of NOTHING, there is simply NOTHNG to reveal, conceal or determine; so NOTHING can be misconstrued! It's a WIN-WIN! Heehee

 

Yes honey, your blog did read more from a stand-point of "men are prettier than women." You convey your thoughts best, JUST NOW! LOL... 

While it is true the majority of males are "prettier" in the animal kingdom, this does not ring true for mankind! God/ Mother Nature/ Universe/ Big Bang Theory.. WHATEVER ONE BELIEVES..  made women prettier, and man physically stronger.. And for me, that's a good thing, cuz sledge-hammers are much harder to lift than my 5 gallons of face paint!!

 

July 21, 2101 Florida Heat! 


Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    1 up Bookmark and Share
SpeedDallas Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 46
Posted on Fri, Jul 12, 2013 06:16

PS. When did this blog "officially" become high-jacked?

 

Almost from day 1. The point of the thread was that there are very few wealthy, attractive, under 60 year old men, who are not married and thusly difficult to find one.

 

As part of the set up to that thought I mentioned that in the animal kingdom males are generally more attractive than females and thusly it might be assumed that is likewise in we talking monkeys. That was a positive, if true, for females, but no one agreed  That seemed to turn the thread into whether men or women are more attractive. Ironically, if true that women are more attractive to men,  that opinion basically adds to my original point as it says there are more attractive females than males in the population, hence more competition for the low number of young wealthy attractive single men. Then it moved to pedicures and now to where it currently resides. Pretty comical.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1229
Posted on Fri, Jul 12, 2013 04:13

Quoting Hoping4Love2000:

SUNNY! SUNNY!! SUNNY!!!

 

Now remember!!

 

DAK and I have met before, and YES! I DID take a sneak peek photo of him!!

 

The reason he finds difficulty in finding a date? 

 

Well, I had to take the photo from underneath the table... 

 

BUT THESE ARE DAKOTA'S FEET!! 

 

I told him time and time again....

 

Crop the ears back and stop wearing pink! ;)

 

PS. When did this blog "officially" become high-jacked?



That's just not right!!!  I didn't give you permission to take my photo or put it on the internet for the world to see.  What's wrong with a man liking pink bunny pajamas?  And for your info, I think the ears are just fine.  It's just sad that you had to out me.  This is really going to effect my self esteem.  I don't care, I'm still going to wear them.  I'm so angry!!!   



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Hoping4Love2000
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1323
Posted on Thu, Jul 11, 2013 05:52

Quoting Dakota35:

I ain't joking when I say; those are some nice sexy feet!  I've never had a foot fetish but everything has to have beginning.  Nice!

 

I just had a thought.  How about a dating website call Footdate.com where people date based only on their attraction to each others feet?  My foot fetish must have already started. :)



SUNNY! SUNNY!! SUNNY!!!

 

Now remember!!

 

DAK and I have met before, and YES! I DID take a sneak peek photo of him!!

 

The reason he finds difficulty in finding a date? 

 

Well, I had to take the photo from underneath the table... 

 

BUT THESE ARE DAKOTA'S FEET!! 

 

I told him time and time again....

 

Crop the ears back and stop wearing pink! ;)

 

PS. When did this blog "officially" become high-jacked?


Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1229
Posted on Thu, Jul 11, 2013 01:52

Quoting Mtnsunny:

Dak.... I'll lend you a pair for your profile, already polished!



I ain't joking when I say; those are some nice sexy feet!  I've never had a foot fetish but everything has to have beginning.  Nice!

 

I just had a thought.  How about a dating website call Footdate.com where people date based only on their attraction to each others feet?  My foot fetish must have already started. :)



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    1 up Bookmark and Share
Mtnsunny
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 53
Posted on Wed, Jul 10, 2013 08:31

Quoting Dakota35:

Sounds like feet amputation might be a better alternative...??? 

 

It seems as per your description that I might just have more attractive feet than many men.  Soon as I get a chance, I'm going to take a photo of my feet and use it as my profile pic.  I might have a chance after all!!!



Dak.... I'll lend you a pair for your profile, already polished!


Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1229
Posted on Wed, Jul 10, 2013 03:28

Quoting Diana3316:

Perhaps I’m just one of the lucky ones….but some of the men I’ve known in the past, have had some pretty gnarly feet.  Like…Freddy Flintstone had nothing on these guys!  And why some of them thought rubbing my legs with their rough and calloused feet….with a spade on the end of each big toe…..is a good idea…..well, a better woman than me will have to answer THAT question!!!

 

I’m all for man-pedis.



Sounds like feet amputation might be a better alternative...??? 

 

It seems as per your description that I might just have more attractive feet than many men.  Soon as I get a chance, I'm going to take a photo of my feet and use it as my profile pic.  I might have a chance after all!!!



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
SpeedDallas Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 46
Posted on Fri, Jul 05, 2013 05:41

I can understand that. Sounds like the dude who thinks a bearded face is good to sand paper a woman's face with. I can't imagine most women getting turned on by that either. Good health and hygiene are sexy, bad in either by either genders a turn off. Cutting one's nails is not a pedicure.

 

I still with  contend the the day I get pedicure shoot me. Just remove my make-up, wig, and nail extensions the day you do.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Follow - Email me when people comment