#1 Dating Site for Successful Singles and Admirers
Millionaire Blogs > Removed_jkchazz's blogs > proof the universe is love, without religous beliefs
proof the universe is love, without religous beliefs Sort by:
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1
Posted on Mon, May 29, 2006 09:05

Question posed What proof do you have that "God means Love" Without using religious context, or the bible as your primary base, For debate/argument Responsa: If one begins to observe every pixel of reality, one will witness that in all physical matter there are only two governing forces , Positive energy and Negative energy, these are the two dynamic energy?s/forces behind all physical matter in nature. The true fabric behind these two manifested physical energies in the teachings of Kabala is defined as ' the power to give and the power to receive ?. All realty whether perceived as good or perceived as evil is continually in a dynamic struggle of these two forces. Whichever force is empowered with the greater energy manifests in time and Space in the exact measure of their force at that given moment. The greater the power of giving, the greater the power of creation, The greater the power of good the greater is the power to give. And the greater the power to receive the greater is its appetite for receiving. Unbridled it will become an insatiable power of ?receiving only for oneself? with no means of giving. It is the force behind what is evil and what destroys in nature and in the nature of man. In time and space we know that gravity is the densest part of the galaxy. We in essence create our own gravity the denser we are, the thicker our egos become. The power of? receiving for oneself only''? is what causes the power of hatred and destruction to grow in the universe resulting in our inability to love. The original creation of these two forces manifested as a perfectly balanced vessel completely united as one vessel, with each particle operating in a unified flow of giving and receiving. The receiver was only receiving for the purpose of giving back to the giver, and the giver was giving unconditionally back to the receiver in perfect measure?. endlessly. When the power to give and the power to receive is unified in time and space, this is the ??? energy of love. This eternal flow of divine love/energy was left for our own free will to continue this balance. Our individual time continuum is affected by our own algorithms inside humanity as a whole. If we see that the force of hatred /destruction in the world is stronger then the power of creation, then the buildings of love will take the longer journey, only because we have not equaled the power of giving to the power to receive in ourselves. Our own inability is the cause of this imbalance in ourselves, nature, and the universe. We have contaminated the equation! As we move forward in time and space we are continually correcting this imbalance, either through quick brutal destruction or a compassionate lengthened suffering drop by drop. These are all different algorithms operating in mitigated calculations of strict measurements of compassion and mercy. To the untrained eye it seems like chaos, but in?? divine arithmetic?s all is being measured in a perfectly balanced universal Clock of love We are all correcting, transforming to perfection the original light and power of creation. The unification of the power to give and the power to receive will result and produce a seamless infinite bond. The energy of this bonding is called ??Love.?? the lack of this unification is what makes us ask and question love itself. Stay out the darkness, Chazz


1 up Bookmark and Share
Evergreen2007
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 4
Posted on Thu, Feb 14, 2008 01:19

Chazz, My first response to this question was deleted or lost, so I'll be brief. Regarding your question, my immediate response is that I'm not sure. But I do know that it is so, that God IS Love. Love is not tangible, we cannot touch it, but I do know that it exists--in me, in you, in everyone. It is a positive energy, and God is positive energy. We cannot touch air/oxygen either but know it exists because we inhale and exhale it, we "feel" it. We cannot touch love but know when we are "in" it. This discussion reminds me of similar topics regarding the book, The Secret, which hints at the theory that energy is neither created nor destroyed. I'll stop now, since I am leaning away from the subject. Thank you for posting such an interesting question. Hope to hear more from you. Please take care. And Happy Valentine's Day! Evergreen2007


Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 796
Posted on Mon, Sep 10, 2007 10:40

Is there any way, that there could be a 'neutral' force between the positive and negative? Great read!!!


0 up Bookmark and Share
MountainWinds
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 325
Posted on Mon, Sep 10, 2007 07:45

How did I miss this blog the first time around?


Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
angelface10
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 688
Posted on Sun, Sep 09, 2007 14:12

Chazz... We all need to be instruments of the positive energy... to help offset, the negative that surrounds us... VERY INTERESTING ; D MY HALF... That was a brilliant theory, substantiating the presence of a creator... I must have my son read this, he was searching long ago for answers, but was so turned off by the business side of religion, & never were his questions answered, and finally, being of scientific mind, just decided he needed further proof.. Perhaps this blog, may spark a chord of hope or curiosity, in his tightly closed mind... THANK YOU ! for your contribution ! ; D


Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
angelface10
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 688
Posted on Sun, Sep 09, 2007 12:55

Chazz... Your answer to that question, is the same premise as denying there is a GOD.. FAITH.. OR LACK THEREOF... However, he gave us the BIBLE, as our guide... and the atmosphere of Good, does counterbalance some of the negative, we have in this world.. For without the sharing, the reciprical benefits of GOOD, chaos would surely reign...


Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 6
Posted on Thu, Jun 01, 2006 23:04

Proofs of the Existence of God 4. What proof have we of the existence of God? "The axiom which you apply in all your scientific researches, 'There is no effect without a cause.' Search out the cause of whatever is not the work of man, and reason will furnish the answer to your question." To assure ourselves of the existence of God. we have only to look abroad on the works of creation. The universe exists, therefore It has a cause. To doubt the existence of God is to doubt that every effect has a cause, and to assume that something can have been made by nothing. 5. What is to be inferred from the intuition of the existence of God which may be said to be the common property of the human mind? "That God exists; for whence could the human mind derive this intuition if it had no real basis? The inference to he drawn from the fact of this intuition is a corollary of the axiom. 'There Is no effect without a cause.'" 6. May not our seemingly intuitive sense of the existence of God be the result of education and of acquired ideas? "If such were the case, how should this intuitive sense be possessed by your savages?" If the intuition of the existence of a Supreme Being were only the result of education It would not be universal, and would only exist, like all other acquired knowledge, in the minds of those who had received the special education to which it would be due. 7. Is the first cause of the formation of things to be found in the essential properties of matter? "If such were the case, what would be the cause of those properties? There must always be a first cause." To attribute the first formation of things to the essential properties of matter, would be to take the effect for the cause, for those properties are themselves an effect, which must have a cause. 8. What is to be thought of the opinion that attributes the first formation of things to a fortuitous combination of matter, in other words, to chance? "Another absurdity! Who that is possessed of common sense can regard chance as an intelligent agent? And, besides, what is chance? Nothing." The harmony which regulates the mechanism of the universe can only result from combinations adopted in view of predetermined ends, and thus, by its very nature, reveals the existence of an Intelligent Power. To attribute the first formation of things to chance is nonsense for chance cannot produce the results of intelligence. If chance could be intelligent, it would cease to be chance. 9. What proof have we that the first cause of all things is a Supreme Intelligence, superior to all other intelligences? "You have a proverb which says, 'The workman is known by his work.' Look around you, and, from the quality of the work, infer that of the workman." We judge of the power of an intelligence by its works as no human being could create that which is produced by nature, it is evident that the first cause must be an Intelligence superior to man. Whatever may be the prodigies accomplished by human intelligence, that intelligence itself must have a cause and the greater the results achieved by it, the greater must be the cause of which it is the effect. It is this Supreme Intelligence that is the first cause of all things, whatever the name by which mankind may designate it.


0 up Bookmark and Share
UKArtistinMiami2000
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1
Posted on Tue, May 30, 2006 03:04

Nice to see a guy thinking about these things too!


Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Follow - Email me when people comment