#1 Dating Site for Successful Singles and Admirers
Millionaire Blogs > 3345roc's blogs > Putin versus the World
Putin versus the World Sort by:
Author
3345roc
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 897
Posted on Tue, Mar 18, 2014 20:50

Ukraine buys almost half all its energy (natural gas)from Russia and the rest of the EU is very dependent on Russian energy. Revenues from natural gas sales are a primary source of income for Russia.


Because of the recent disagreement between Ukraine and Russia, Russia
is removinf the discount on the price of natural gas it sells to Ukraine.

Ukraine is almost broke and can't afford the increase in the natural
gas price because it would be forced into bankruptcy.

Obama(the USA) just announced the United States is giving Ukraine $1
billion to assist in paying for the higher priced natural gas it buys
from Russia.

So, the United States is actually giving Russia $1 billion because the
money is just passing through Ukraine.

The first question: Has Putin figured out a way to raise the price of
his natural gas sales and make the U.S. pay for the increase?

Next question: Was he really in the KGB or was he a commodities trader?


This can backfire on Putin if Cyprus and Israel can supply natural gas from it's new finds and the US can also start exporting to Europe.

 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    1 up Bookmark and Share
3345roc
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 897
Posted on Thu, Apr 10, 2014 14:45

Canada's Top Ten List Of American Stupidity

 

10) Only in America … could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 a plate campaign fund-raising event.
9) Only in America … could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General and roughly 20% of the federal work force is black while only 14% of the population is black.  40+% of all federal entitlements go to black Americans – 3X the rate that go to whites, 5X the rate that go to Hispanics!
8) Only in America … could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner (former Secretary of the Treasury) and Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways and Means Committee), BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.
7) Only in America … can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.
6) Only in America … would they make people who want to legally become American 
citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege, while they discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just ‘magically’ become American citizens.
5) Only in America … could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country’s Constitution be thought of as “extremists.”
4) Only in America … could you need to present a driver’s license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote.
3) Only in America … could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).
2) Only in America … could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year – for total spending of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn’t have nearly enough money.
1) Only in America … could the rich people – who pay 86% of all income taxes – be accused of not paying their “fair share” by people who don’t pay any income taxes at all!


Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
billzeke
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1292
Posted on Wed, Apr 09, 2014 07:09

""To blaim this whole debockle on Obama, Bill, is like the thrashing the 2016, Woman President will get all over again. Instilling another President that has his hands in the Blue Chip Conglomerate till did not work with Bush Jr.. We are where we are from there. Make no mistake, If America does not figure a way to work the masses; Game over. The latest is the incursion of foreigners, taking American jobs for less than equal pay. We have graduates in professions in this Country. Do you think these certified American's 24- 50 will stand idle on this incursion? Think again!

The Anninburg Foundation, and other truth organizations usually break the truth in these inflamatory spews. Grain of Salt, Gen!""

 

Obama and Holder are the most devisive POTUS and AG to ever hold office. The DEMs have nothing to run on so they try to distract us with things like income inequality. There will always be income inequality in a free enterprise society.

 

We shouldn'd have to raise the minimum wage. If Obama and Holder did their jobs and controlled the border; they would dry up the influx of illegal cheap labor and wages would rise on their own due to market demands... 

 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
leonicvirgo
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 713
Posted on Tue, Apr 08, 2014 20:44

Quoting billzeke:

In early January 2014, Bob Lonsberry, a Rochester talk radio personality on WHAM 1180 AM, said this in response to Obama's "income inequality speech."
 
Two Americas
 
The Democrats are right, there are two Americas.  The America that works, and the America that doesn't.  The America that contributes, and the America that doesn't.
It’s not the haves and the have nots, it’s the dos and the don’ts.
 
Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don’t.  That’s the divide in America.  It’s not about income inequality, it’s about civic irresponsibility.

It’s about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office.  It’s about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country.

That’s not invective, that’s truth, and it’s about time someone said it.
 
The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting “income inequality.”   He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that’s not just.
 
That is the rationale of thievery.  The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it for you.  Vote Democrat.

That is the philosophy that produced Detroit.   It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.  It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal.
 
The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victim-hood and anger instead of ability and hope.
 
The president’s premise – that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful – seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spares the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.
 
Because, by and large, income variations in society are a result of different choices leading to different consequences, those who choose wisely and responsibly have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure.   Success and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income.

You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. 
You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course; you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course. Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take.

My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do.  There is significant income inequality between us.  Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but, our lives also have had an inequality of effort.  While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to
medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant.  He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes.  His outcome pays a lot better than mine. Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth?  No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes.
 
It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom.  The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail.  There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.

 The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy.  Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing.  Even if the other guy made a lifetime’s worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions.

 Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort.  The simple Law of the Harvest – as ye sow, so shall ye reap – is sometimes applied as, “The harder you work, the more you get."  Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society.
 
Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way.   He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity.  He and his party speak of two Americas, and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. 

America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man’s success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man’s victimization.
 
What Obama offered was not a solution, but a separatism.  He fomented division and strife, pitted one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit.  That’s what socialists offer.  Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow.
 
Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln’s maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.



To blaim this whole debockle on Obama, Bill, is like the thrashing the 2016, Woman President will get all over again. Instilling another President that has his hands in the Blue Chip Conglomerate till did not work with Bush Jr.. We are where we are from there. Make no mistake, If America does not figure a way to work the masses; Game over. The latest is the incursion of foreigners, taking American jobs for less than equal pay. We have graduates in professions in this Country. Do you think these certified American's 24- 50 will stand idle on this incursion? Think again!

The Anninburg Foundation, and other truth organizations usually break the truth in these inflamatory spews. Grain of Salt, Gen!



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
billzeke
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1292
Posted on Tue, Apr 08, 2014 08:53

In early January 2014, Bob Lonsberry, a Rochester talk radio personality on WHAM 1180 AM, said this in response to Obama's "income inequality speech."
 
Two Americas
 
The Democrats are right, there are two Americas.  The America that works, and the America that doesn't.  The America that contributes, and the America that doesn't.
It’s not the haves and the have nots, it’s the dos and the don’ts.
 
Some people do their duty as Americans, obey the law, support themselves, contribute to society, and others don’t.  That’s the divide in America.  It’s not about income inequality, it’s about civic irresponsibility.

It’s about a political party that preaches hatred, greed and victimization in order to win elective office.  It’s about a political party that loves power more than it loves its country.

That’s not invective, that’s truth, and it’s about time someone said it.
 
The politics of envy was on proud display a couple weeks ago when President Obama pledged the rest of his term to fighting “income inequality.”   He noted that some people make more than other people, that some people have higher incomes than others, and he says that’s not just.
 
That is the rationale of thievery.  The other guy has it, you want it, Obama will take it for you.  Vote Democrat.

That is the philosophy that produced Detroit.   It is the electoral philosophy that is destroying America.  It conceals a fundamental deviation from American values and common sense because it ends up not benefiting the people who support it, but a betrayal.
 
The Democrats have not empowered their followers, they have enslaved them in a culture of dependence and entitlement, of victim-hood and anger instead of ability and hope.
 
The president’s premise – that you reduce income inequality by debasing the successful – seeks to deny the successful the consequences of their choices and spares the unsuccessful the consequences of their choices.
 
Because, by and large, income variations in society are a result of different choices leading to different consequences, those who choose wisely and responsibly have a far greater likelihood of success, while those who choose foolishly and irresponsibly have a far greater likelihood of failure.   Success and failure usually manifest themselves in personal and family income.

You choose to drop out of high school or to skip college and you are apt to have a different outcome than someone who gets a diploma and pushes on with purposeful education. 
You have your children out of wedlock and life is apt to take one course; you have them within a marriage and life is apt to take another course. Most often in life our destination is determined by the course we take.

My doctor, for example, makes far more than I do.  There is significant income inequality between us.  Our lives have had an inequality of outcome, but, our lives also have had an inequality of effort.  While my doctor went to college and then devoted his young adulthood to
medical school and residency, I got a job in a restaurant.  He made a choice, I made a choice, and our choices led us to different outcomes.  His outcome pays a lot better than mine. Does that mean he cheated and Barack Obama needs to take away his wealth?  No, it means we are both free men in a free society where free choices lead to different outcomes.
 
It is not inequality Barack Obama intends to take away, it is freedom.  The freedom to succeed, and the freedom to fail.  There is no true option for success if there is no true option for failure.

 The pursuit of happiness means a whole lot less when you face the punitive hand of government if your pursuit brings you more happiness than the other guy.  Even if the other guy sat on his arse and did nothing.  Even if the other guy made a lifetime’s worth of asinine and shortsighted decisions.

 Barack Obama and the Democrats preach equality of outcome as a right, while completely ignoring inequality of effort.  The simple Law of the Harvest – as ye sow, so shall ye reap – is sometimes applied as, “The harder you work, the more you get."  Obama would turn that upside down. Those who achieve are to be punished as enemies of society and those who fail are to be rewarded as wards of society.
 
Entitlement will replace effort as the key to upward mobility in American society if Barack Obama gets his way.   He seeks a lowest common denominator society in which the government besieges the successful and productive to foster equality through mediocrity.  He and his party speak of two Americas, and their grip on power is based on using the votes of one to sap the productivity of the other. 

America is not divided by the differences in our outcomes, it is divided by the differences in our efforts. It is a false philosophy to say one man’s success comes about unavoidably as the result of another man’s victimization.
 
What Obama offered was not a solution, but a separatism.  He fomented division and strife, pitted one set of Americans against another for his own political benefit.  That’s what socialists offer.  Marxist class warfare wrapped up with a bow.
 
Two Americas, coming closer each day to proving the truth to Lincoln’s maxim that a house divided against itself cannot stand.




Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Jenkneee
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 652
Posted on Thu, Apr 03, 2014 16:40

Quoting wabisabi8:

Dear Dakota

 

PLEASE PLEASE READ SOME hisrory of the (Indian) NW Frontier HOW CAN my yank friends ,well

 

How can some US citiZens be so niaeve  and insular. All the world admires OBAMA!; Don't you Know that just by

 

electing him,  the USA can never be accused of racism again.

 

Regards Ian



Lol, I hope you are not serious, no, all the world does not admire Obama but certainly most of the following admire him; socialists, Muslims, illegals, athiests and gays, our enemies and last but not least,  all those who got a free phone along with everything else for free.

 

 

Please type complete sentences, you typed, " HOW CAN my yank friends ,well"

 

 

 

If you haven't guessed , I absolutely hate Obama and feel strongly that he should be impeached and tried for treason.

 

 

 "A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have".  Gerald Ford

 

 

 

"First they came for the Communists but I was not a Communist so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Socialists and the Trade Unionists but I was not one of them, so I did not speak out. Then they came for the Jews but I was not Jewish so I did not speak out. And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me."  Martin Niemoeller



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
3345roc
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 897
Posted on Sun, Mar 30, 2014 19:22

Quoting Summer20142002:

Dakota,

    Putin did not grow up poor. His grandfather was Stalin's chef. That means his family was well thought of and close to the top. They were given preferences as seen in his fast rise to the top of the KGB. You don't get there by not being well connected. It is the most powerful position in Russia. 



I guess you can't believe his autobiography.  He claims to have come from humble beginnings and lived in a communal apartment in Leningrad.  His mother was a factory worker and though his grandfather occasionaly cooked for Stalin, Putin was a year old when Stalin died and his rise in the KGB was far from meteoric.  He resigned as a Lt. Col before their ill fated coup against Gorbachev.

 

Putin is old school and certainly hasn't hidden the fact that he would like the USSR reconstituted. Can you say Cold War Redux!



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1217
Posted on Fri, Mar 28, 2014 12:07

Quoting Summer20142002:

Dakota,

    Putin did not grow up poor. His grandfather was Stalin's chef. That means his family was well thought of and close to the top. They were given preferences as seen in his fast rise to the top of the KGB. You don't get there by not being well connected. It is the most powerful position in Russia. 



 

I didn't say Putin grew up poor, that was someone else that I posted a response to.  

 

I agree with your Obama analogy.  And if I were president and really thought a leader was bad.  Then that leader would meet a tragic end, my last resort would be go to war or even sanctions, which hurt the people.  I'd never even bring up any issue with a leader, nor warn him.  He would just die un expectantly.  Can't afford to play games when the stakes are high.

 

As for Russia supplying gas to the Ukraine.  That's true. BUT, due to fracking now the world has a abundance of NG.  So Putin is losing his hold and he knows it.  Russian NG is not as needed as before.  You have companies like (LNG stock symbol) that is planning on exporting.  There are American companies that are making ventures in Europe to utilize fracking technology.  So Putin is losing control.  Now with that said, I can't stand Obama nor do I trust him.  So I'm not sure which side to take in the Ukraine situation.  It's bottom of the barrel new to me anyway. 

 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1217
Posted on Fri, Mar 28, 2014 11:52

Quoting Princess_Tatiana:

Putin was never poor. If you work in KGB then you are definitely not an angel, but it also means that you are smart as hell. He has $40 billions, and everyone knows that it’s not from his salary, but he is smart and no-one can prove that. He is a badass and a smartass, other wise he would’t be a president right now, and I’m sure that he will find or make the way to stay at his position as long as he wants. Putin knows that he has the power and he knows how to manage it.  

 

PS “Russia and the Ukraine have hot women, that's also one of their major exports.” I’m personally not very proud of that image. Yes we have very beautiful woman, but it’s not export…you kidding me?!?! 



Okay maybe not a export in the normal sense but you have to admit that large numbers of  beautiful women are leaving the FSU and moving to the USA and other countries.  And these are women that have been sold a bill of goods by dating agencies that are just not true, and on the other side, the men have been sold the same.  And usually these marriages do not work.  When I made the statement "major export" that was me being humorous, not being serious.  No one is exporting women "legally", unless you count the dating agencies.

 

 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
3345roc
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 897
Posted on Thu, Mar 27, 2014 11:28

Quoting Summer20142002:

Roc,

   Do you really think a hot woman from Russia/Ukrane would be looking for a western man for anything more than a visa?


My comment related to the post made by Classicluck.  She is Ukranian and lives in San Diego.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
3345roc
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 897
Posted on Thu, Mar 27, 2014 11:25

Quoting Summer20142002:

I addressed it to ROC



My comment was addressed to Joe542



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Summer20142002 Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 4
Posted on Thu, Mar 27, 2014 10:16

Dakota,

    Putin did not grow up poor. His grandfather was Stalin's chef. That means his family was well thought of and close to the top. They were given preferences as seen in his fast rise to the top of the KGB. You don't get there by not being well connected. It is the most powerful position in Russia. 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Summer20142002 Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 4
Posted on Thu, Mar 27, 2014 10:13

Roc,

   Do you really think a hot woman from Russia/Ukrane would be looking for a western man for anything more than a visa?



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Summer20142002 Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 4
Posted on Thu, Mar 27, 2014 10:11

I addressed it to ROC



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Summer20142002 Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 4
Posted on Thu, Mar 27, 2014 10:09

Putin was the chairman of the KGB and is now the country's leader. This is a man who will pulll the trigger. Obama doesn't even know what a trigger is but he does have a big mouth. I can't believe that in only 6 years, Obama has destroyed the US in the eyes of the world as a superpower by bowing to the wrong people and playing hardball with those with whom he is no match. Someone should have told Obama not to draw a line in the sand in his bluff against Putin. You will notice not only is Putin not paying any attention to either Obama's retoric or any remarks by the UN. He will do what we wants to do. He has a large port in the Cremiea and the Ukraine serves as an outer buffer against the west. He can't allow the Ukraine to go western and we should keep our noses out of it. I love the way the jerk in office is throwing around money we cannot afford to give away. That is the mind set of someone who has never worked in his life and lived on the dole. Maybe he should be known as the "Dole President."

       Europe relys on Russia for their gas and oil. They will not back Obama. They can't afford to. If the Ukraine spends the money on buying Russian gas, then Putin is one slick world leader. 


Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
3345roc
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 897
Posted on Wed, Mar 26, 2014 09:50

Quoting Joe542:

You need to read what Paul Craig Roberts has to say. Look up his website at Paul Craig Roberts. You are not getting all the facts.



Who are you addressing this comment to?



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Joe542 Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1
Posted on Wed, Mar 26, 2014 07:23

You need to read what Paul Craig Roberts has to say. Look up his website at Paul Craig Roberts. You are not getting all the facts.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1217
Posted on Tue, Mar 25, 2014 09:54

Quoting classicluck:

Good for you!;) Ukrainian girls are totally not for everyone;))...



Share what you know, to further educate me.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Dakota35
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1217
Posted on Tue, Mar 25, 2014 09:53

Quoting hollywoodesign:

The truth can ALWAYS only be found on the internet! Our media brainwashes us into believing what the CIA (who writes the stories coming out of the AP, which is our main source of information) wants us to believe. Our beloved leaders do not like Putin because he won't go along with their crap. He is against the New World Order and doesn't want any part of it. Thus he is made to look like the bad guy. Besides, if we piss off Russia then maybe the oligarcies  can get us into WWIII with Russia and China! That is a main goal, since they want to illiminate 80% of us. What a better way, than to have us wipe out each other! We should only wish we could have a President like Putin. He spent millions of dollars to make sure the election that put him in power was completly transparent, live streaming every election poll place, so that the people could watch the counting of the votes. He was on TV answering cold call questions without any screening or 4 hours before the elections. The first thing he did when he won was tell the oligarcies that they will now pay their part of the tax that they always illegally avoided. He made sure that the people would own their land when they finished purchasing it instead of the setup previously used which is like Mexico, where you are only renting and never own...or like America! Because we are in the same situation as Mexico and are hood-winked into believing we own our land! If we truly owned it we would not have to pay taxes on it nor give it up to the government whenever they got a notion to steal it from us giving us much less than value for it whether we want to sell or not(imminent domain). THE TRUTH is our government gave a million dollars of our tax money to a group that caused all the violence in the streets of Ukraine with the alternative motive of changing out the leadership of Ukraine. It was a coo. A stategy with many end games. Our constant interfeiring with every countries lives is growing tiresome and expensive. I don't want my money going to Ukraine or into some theives pocket that is in the pathway to there! Our economy is bad, we are broke! Or so they tell us, because how can we be broke when our money is worthless and they just keep printing more! The unseen tax of inflation is over the top! One silver dime pays for a gallon of gas, since it is equivalent to $3. Of course, depending on what part of the country you are in. If we got rid of the criminal FED which is not even Federal at all, abut as Federal as Wells Fargo! and went back to the gold standard maybe we could get a grip on the economy. Obama is not an American, nor is he for America. His goal from the beginning was to distroy America and he is doing a great job. Wake up! Turn off the television and take an hour a day to stuy the truth on the internet, before they take that away from us too. We are already losing most of our illegid freedom, which was really only an illusion anyway. Don't believe me? Then lets start with s couple of the basic illusions...look up the definition of The United States of America in the legal lawyers dictionary. It is a corportation. It is not a free country. The President is the President of the corporation, the Department of education, the Department of Agriculture are the departments of the corporation. Who do you think owns the Corporation? The International Bankers. Then look this up. ..America has 2 flags: one is a civil peacetimee flag and the other is a wartime flag. Of course we all only get to see the wartime flag. The other one has the stripes vertical instead of horizontal. This is because Washington DC is in charge of the wars. It is one of three city states. Washington DC is not part of America, it is a city state, along with Vatican City, who is in charge of religion and the 3rd one is London city who is in charge of the money. The three city states have their own flag (with 3 stars on it), their own laws, their own judicial system, etc...how else do you think the government can get away with comitting all the crimes they do! 



I agree with a large part of this.  I don't believe Putin is a moral guy. Everything else is pretty close to the way it is.  It's just a matter of time, before it all goes down.  To much greed.  All the wealth in the world is controlled by a handful of banks.  Evil is rampant.


Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
3345roc
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 897
Posted on Tue, Mar 25, 2014 05:57

Quoting Dakota35:

Yep, and she's just a average looking Russian.  I had a guy from St. Petersburg tell me that he thought the hottest women were in the Ukraine.  Told me to stay away from the women in Moscova.  Also, met a girl on this site that called herself Russian but was actually from one of the FSU countries (they all do that).  I asked her about going to Russia and finding a woman.  She said it was a bad idea.  That if I wanted a Russian, then there were plenty here in the US.  And she is correct, FL is full of Russians.  I met a waitress in PCB, FL that was Russian, and had very little personality.  But I've become wiser with age, I don't really believe a cute, little, down to earth southern girl can be beat.  So the Russian idea has kinda left me.



..... yes, and it seems one of them, who is both gorgeous and quite accomplished, lives in San Diego!



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Follow - Email me when people comment